Just to take on one point:
since religions tend to vary, and religion and science cannot marry in their endeavors without prejudice, science is the best way to teach our children the basics of God without prejudice of religion.
Science deals with empirical evidence. Religions deal with scripture, dogma, belief, "divine revelation" and the like, and cringe at any attempt of science to evaluate those using empirical evidence.
But now you want science to abandon its established methods and accept scripture, revelation and the like -- most likely with no critical analysis -- and accept your religious beliefs. And to teach them as if they were science.
Sorry, you have it entirely backwards.
It is evidence first, then the rest.
You want science to teach about deities, science will first have to have evidence of deities. And that evidence will have to withstand critical examination. So far the claims of various religions have fared quite poorly when subjected to critical examination.
Example: the global flood about 4,350 years ago. That religious belief has been disproved with overwhelming evidence.
Example: a young earth. Likewise.
Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
™ Version 4.2
