Intelligent Design == Human Design?

Energy does not "evolve". We do not exist "inside" of energy. Energy does not "interact". What is "a constant singular source"? The singularity of Big Bang comsology is not constant - it exists at a single point in space-time. This is just a mixture of trivial facts and bizarre claims - is it supposed to demonstrate something? We certainly won't ignore it. But there is NOTHING in science that says a "god" is there, whatever this "god" is.

Not at all, and don't call me surly Yes! That is a very good idea. If you did that, you would not make such silly statements about energy. You are not alone - most popular science makes exactly the same mistakes. Yes, incorrectly applied by those that don't understand what they are writing. This is NOT the definition of energy. Nope, as I continually stress at this site. Matter is a field. Energy is an attribute of the field.Oops, late for something - got to go...

And how is this any different to every other point in space-time? The singularity is much less special than you appreciate...

No, that's based on me being an expert on singularities The trouble is that you have yet to realise just how little you know. A good degree from a good university is the usual cure for that. If you come out of your degree thinking that you actually know something about the subject you have gone to study, you and your university failed. Your post-grad work is where you actually start learning something. And your post-doc time is where you perhaps start knowing a little. And this kind of attitude will always prevent you from learning anything - you will just be one more crank. Cranks always think they can skip the 100 years of study that has already gone into a subject. Fact is, they're just lazy arseholes who haven't got 1/100th of the grey matter necessary to cut it. Is that you, Tesla? Or can you be different from all the rest?To conclude - you will never understand the nature of space-time until you can appreciate why the singularity is just like every other point is space-time. Once you understand that, then you can go on to see how it is different...

Oh dear, I hadn't read this earlier when I made my previous post: Sadly, you know far less than I anticipated. You would have been laughed out of town 80 years ago, never mind in 2010."It has to have an edge" belongs up there with believing we'd suffocate if we travelled over 25mph on the railroad...

You'll never know, 'cos I quickly loose interest in trying to educate those who have no desire to learn...

Hey, what a great idea. Perhaps I should devote a large fraction of my life to cosmological research, and start writing papers... oh, wait.Moron

Again, you know so little of what you are talking that you cannot make sense. It depnds what you mean by "singularity". The singularity of the Big Bang cosmological solutions of General Relativity exists as an artifact of the model, and we know a great deal about it. In reality, there is almost certainly no singularity. What is not understood is what replaces the singularity. To even begin to understand the issue you need to understand what is being replaced.Jus to be clear, this is aimed at the wider audience for their understanding and not at you, tesla. For you are a moron