Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
10 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,815 Year: 3,072/9,624 Month: 917/1,588 Week: 100/223 Day: 11/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Genetic Redundancy and Natural Selection
Admin
Director
Posts: 12998
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 2 of 37 (564651)
06-11-2010 3:27 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by BobTHJ
06-11-2010 2:00 PM


BobTHJ writes:
I hate to start a new thread at a time when I am already vastly behind in my replies on other threads...
You *are* a bit busy in other threads, but I have a couple requests for this thread proposal.
Could you define "non-synonymous point mutation?" Not everyone is going to know what that means.
And could you explain how evidence *against* evolution as an explanation for SRC genes is evidence *for* a designed explanation?

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by BobTHJ, posted 06-11-2010 2:00 PM BobTHJ has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by BobTHJ, posted 06-11-2010 3:48 PM Admin has replied

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 12998
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 4 of 37 (564659)
06-11-2010 3:58 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by BobTHJ
06-11-2010 3:48 PM


BobTHJ writes:
Design is simply the conclusion that I and the author of the article draw. I could go into detail, but it seems to be beyond the scope of the question.
Issues outside the intended scope of your thread proposal are probably best left unmentioned. There's an edit button.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by BobTHJ, posted 06-11-2010 3:48 PM BobTHJ has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by BobTHJ, posted 06-11-2010 4:12 PM Admin has replied

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 12998
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 6 of 37 (564671)
06-11-2010 5:03 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by BobTHJ
06-11-2010 4:12 PM


BobTHJ writes:
The article I linked is the first in a series. Dr. Borger outlines in subsequent articles a YEC design-oriented baramin-based hypothesis that seems to fit the data rather well.
Okay, if you could include a link to the message in Biological classification vs 'Kind' where the baramin-based hypothesis's supporting evidence is outlined then that should be fine.
Edited by Admin, : Grammar.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by BobTHJ, posted 06-11-2010 4:12 PM BobTHJ has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by BobTHJ, posted 06-11-2010 5:13 PM Admin has replied

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 12998
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 8 of 37 (564678)
06-11-2010 5:23 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by BobTHJ
06-11-2010 5:13 PM


One of the primary goals of EvC Forum is to host discussions that actually get somewhere, and we attempt to achieve that goal through moderation that keeps discussions from drifting off topic or leaving points hanging or unsupported and so forth. We also try to make sure topics are clearly defined before they're promoted. If you're planning to take your thread in a direction that's based upon baraminology that I'd feel more comfortable if we had a working definition of baraminology and its supporting evidence. So if it's not already in the Biological classification vs 'Kind' thread then that would be a good place to put it.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by BobTHJ, posted 06-11-2010 5:13 PM BobTHJ has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by BobTHJ, posted 06-11-2010 5:34 PM Admin has replied

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 12998
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 10 of 37 (564691)
06-11-2010 6:51 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by BobTHJ
06-11-2010 5:34 PM


Hide comments.
Edited by Admin, : Grammar.
Edited by Admin, : Hide comments.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by BobTHJ, posted 06-11-2010 5:34 PM BobTHJ has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by BobTHJ, posted 06-12-2010 2:02 AM Admin has replied

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 12998
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 12 of 37 (564752)
06-12-2010 9:44 AM
Reply to: Message 11 by BobTHJ
06-12-2010 2:02 AM


Hi Bob,
To avoid having any influence on the thread I'll go back and hide my comments that might tend to do that. Just please keep in mind that you'll be asked for evidence supporting your position.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by BobTHJ, posted 06-12-2010 2:02 AM BobTHJ has not replied

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 12998
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 13 of 37 (564754)
06-12-2010 9:45 AM


Thread Copied from Proposed New Topics Forum
Thread copied here from the Genetic Redundancy and Natural Selection thread in the Proposed New Topics forum.

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024