If complexity requires design, where did the Deity come from?

Why? Why can't there be multiple true gods? Not really, no. Well, then you lose, because it doesn't. There aren't any chariot wheels found along the beaches of the red sea, hell, even the coral structures in the red sea (well, not the red sea, actually but the Arabian gulf), have never been verified as being chariot wheels. And even if they were, this still isn't evidence they're from the exodus event. Also, there is of course no possibility that the ten commandments event was written when the top was already black? No they didn't. Even god? Or does it then suddenly not apply? Your DNA is different for your fathers as well.

Since none of those things have the slightest thing to do with evolution, you still failed to provide what was asked of you.

No it isn't. Unless you want to call your god poofing it out of nothing abiogenesis too. I suspect you are referring to a strictly natural explanation though. By the way, got a source for these "shells of lobsters that are still alive"? And why does this mean fossilisation doesn't take a long time? And what does the speed it takes a fossil to form have to do with evolution? Really? Why? And yet those same scientists also don't deny evolution. What a weird thing for them to do, unless, of course, you are wrong. Which you are. Yes they can, and are. You just don't understand the second law, as is evident. For one, it only applies to a closed system, which the earth is not. No it doesn't. What does this have to do with evolution anyway. Also has nothing to do with evlution. And you were wrong in that thread as well, painfully wrong, in fact. And yet these same scientists accept evolution. Weird huh? They are both right. You on the other hand, are wrong.

I already told you, they're not conflicting. Nylon bacteria. Seeing as apparently you didn;t put too much effort in understanding even the second law of thermodynamics (not knowing it only apllies to a closed system for instance) I fail to see why is should go to great lengths to do your homework for you. Also, why would this be a problem for evolution? You coulkd start by providing what was asked of you (evidence for conflicting theories in evolution).

Ok, here's a post I made some time ago on this forum, about nylon bacteria. I suggest you read it.Our topic today concerns a bacteria, that through evolution, can now digest nylon.This is the original gene: This gene was copied. But no new information was created, since it was a copy. This also means that one copy can mutate freely.The next thing that happened wasn't just any mutation, but the most dramatic one we know. A frameshift mutation. This will affect every single amino acid from the point of the frameshift onwards. An example of how this works:Amino acids are formed by a combination of three nucleotides, for example:|G A A | C G C|
Glutamate|ArginineNow, when you insert a nucleotide (which is what this mutation does), it doesn't just change the amino acid it gets inserted to, but every single one after that as well, again for example we insert C into the first position:|C G A | A C G| C
Alanine|ThreonineSo much for the example.There are 427 amino acids in the original gene. Now, creationists like to claim that the ability to digest nylon was already there in the gene, but they're wrong.The frameshift occurred at the 33rd amino acid, altering over 92% of the gene's information. Seen here in red: This is NOT a loss of information, however, because this gene is a copy.The frameshift added a new sequence to the gene, seen here in green: But not only that, it also made a new start codon at the insertion point. This means that this is an entirely new gene!This is the entirely new gene: And now: How much information was created by this?There are 4 nucleotides total.So, when we take the equation from information theory:LOG₂(4) = 2 bits (the 4 here being the total number of possibilities)An amino acid is made by three nucleotides, so that is:3*2 bits = 6 bits for every amino acidsince this mutation generated a sequence of 392 amino acids, we get:392*6 bits = 2352 bits of completely new information.The source of all this can be found hereAnd the video I kinda transcribed here is found here-----Now on with the rest: Thus, it changed the environment, and was natural selection at work. Uhm, well, the dated layers do correspond to the "story". And yhis has what to do with evolution? Thos other scientists still think birds evolved. This is not a competing theory of evolution however, this is a competing theory in evolution. The mechanisms the birds evolved with are the same in both cases.So, no evidence as of yet. I wonder if we'll ever see any.

I wonder why all you do on these forums is project what creationists do on people who care about the truth.You never add anything to the debate, you never say anything of value, and you seem to be coyote's personal board stalker.In short, gow up, grow a pair, and if you really think you're so right in all this, show it or shut up.But I think that like a smal chold, you'd rather just insult some people and project other's faults on to them. Typical.