So, do you have a question about evolution?
mike the wiz writes:
There's that, "we" again. Obviously, if "we" you mean naturalists, evolutionists, secularists, etc....strictly neo Darwinists, or whatever, then the little you know does not dictate that you must accept therefore, that we came from an original common ancestor.
I just meant
scientists. I should have asked:
So you base your conclusions on what you do not know rather than what you do know? What an odd way of looking at things.
As for the rest of your response, I admit that my mental powers are inferior to yours. I cannot understand what you are saying.
mike writes:
Therefore, while I accept that adaptation exists, mutations are random sampling errors, a poor explanation of incredible information-levels. (One example is 7 million bibles on one slide). That's the best density possible in nature. It's not only design - it's sheer genius design, far beyond human design.
What? Seven million bibles on one slide? What the heck are you talking about?
The rest seems to be a Gish Gallop but I'm too dense to get your points.
If you are trying to increase my knowledge it went right over my head.
Tactimatically speaking, the molecubes are out of alignment. -- S.Valley
What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python
You can't build a Time Machine without Weird Optics -- S. Valley