Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,742 Year: 3,999/9,624 Month: 870/974 Week: 197/286 Day: 4/109 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Is It Science? ⇒

I need an answer

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   I need an answer
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4215 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007

Normal Thread Display
Message 35 of 58 (567881)
07-02-2010 11:55 PM 		Reply to: Message 33 by Peg
07-02-2010 10:51 PM

However, at some point down the track, the evolutionists began to realise that the 'origin' of life itself is a different topic to the evolution that they were studying. They have since separated the two subjects into
1. Evolution - 'the changes we see in populations over time'
&
2. Abiogenesis - 'the origin of the first living things'
​
They have always been separated. They are in no way related . Whether life stated by Abiogenesis or not, has no effect on evolution.
​
There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
​
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
​
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008
This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by Peg, posted 07-02-2010 10:51 PM Peg has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by Peg, posted 07-03-2010 3:02 AM bluescat48 has replied
  
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4215 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007

Normal Thread Display
Message 50 of 58 (567938)
07-03-2010 11:02 AM 		Reply to: Message 37 by Peg
07-03-2010 3:02 AM

Well not always, lets be honest about that. Spontaneous Generation preceeded the current term 'abiogenesis' by many centuries...that is that flies are produced from rotten meat for example....Louis pasteurs experiements put the belief to rest until 1924 when Alexander Oparin revived the spontaneous generation argument by speculating on earths primitive conditions and the primordial soup.
​
Spontaneous generation and abiogenisis are 2 different things. SG is life from dead life whereas Abiogenesis is life from non life. Again you are using two different ideas as the same.
​
There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
​
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
​
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008
This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Peg, posted 07-03-2010 3:02 AM Peg has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024