Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,410 Year: 3,667/9,624 Month: 538/974 Week: 151/276 Day: 25/23 Hour: 1/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Circular reasoning
Blue Jay
Member (Idle past 2719 days)
Posts: 2843
From: You couldn't pronounce it with your mouthparts
Joined: 02-04-2008


Message 3 of 142 (569856)
07-24-2010 8:56 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Pauline
07-20-2010 3:08 PM


Hi, Pauline.
Pauline writes:
But here's the deal: I argue that it is impossible to ascribe ultimate authority to someone/something without said someone/something declaring itself the ultimate authority.
So, I can't call someone an authority unless they call themselves an authority?
Is that what you’re saying?
-----
Pauline writes:
For instance, Christians declare God to the ultimate authority; Rationalists declare reason to be the ultimate authority, Some but not all atheists declare science to be the ultimate authority.
In the rationalist and atheist approaches, the conclusion is not reason or science. So, since the premise and the conclusion are not the same, this is not circular reasoning.

-Bluejay (a.k.a. Mantis, Thylacosmilus)
Darwin loves you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Pauline, posted 07-20-2010 3:08 PM Pauline has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024