Bolder-dash's very own little thread

Secondly, I have stated again and again some of the great flaws of your theory, namely that demonstrating the mechanisms by which evolution occurs over long periods of time, particularly in regards to creating new and unique body plans, is something that evolutionists are not able to do.

Now of course, virtually every evolutionist on this site will pull out the same BS card of simply saying its all in a magic book, and well if you knew anything about biology (bullshit, I know about biology) without citing that proof, so the argument then becomes virtually impossible to get to the heart of. They claim this is a valid argument, simply because they can repeat it again and again ad nauseum (just wait they will do it here again!

I predict Dr.A to be the first).

Let's allow him to fully formulate an argument before we attack it.

So the obvious point is that if this is the standard method by which all functioning body plans came to be, then these types of slightly beneficial mutations must be quite abundant throughout species populations ...

Secondly, if one is going to now use this argument for your ToE you then have to acknowledge that all this time when you were arguing that it was point mutations and the like, causing these beneficial mutations, you were completely wrong, and thus much proffer some apologies.

Certainly nowhere near as long as the thousands or hundreds of thousands of years that your side claims is necessary for these small incremental changes to take hold in a population.

And then if we waited another very long time (or as Dr. A wants to suggest we only have to wait less than 40 years ...

we would see those same creatures now, all with the light patches, and even more fortunately some of them have gotten a little depression in their bodies, EXACTLY where that little light patch happens to be, and amazingly enough that little depression (I mean little depression in animals bodies happen mutationallly all the time I guess right) ALSO happens to provide a small little concave surface which helps focus the light every so slightly more, such that now those with the depression are even better at navigating than those without the depression. Mutations are much more fortunate now in this scenario than we first thought. But don't worry, there will be more of these fortunate little depressions. And then after than a cornea will pop up. And some time after that, rods will pop up, and then cones, and then a retinal nerve, and then of course an iris and then a pupil..or will it be a pupil first, and then an iris?But of course we are just getting started, because two of them will certainly be better than one. And if they are perfectly symmetrical, so much the better. I wish we could also get a tear duct. Whoa, viola! You got it. Would you like an eyelid? great. It will help if that eyelid is extremely rapid, so rapid that it can move at the speed of a blink. And you know what, its not just one form of liquid we get to luck into our tear ducts, its two!! Bonus time.

We could of course go on and on with these fortunate beneficial mutations which are so rare, but let's return to the present for now. Where are these light sensitive patches that pop up now and again like they used to during the pre-Cambrian?

The mechanism for common ancestry is reproduction - and I'm sure you've seen the evidence for that yourself.