Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
10 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,815 Year: 3,072/9,624 Month: 917/1,588 Week: 100/223 Day: 11/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Bolder-dash's very own little thread
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 92 of 109 (570900)
07-29-2010 10:59 AM


This guy has no intention of learning anything. Y'all are wasting your time (unless you're having fun of course).

Replies to this message:
 Message 93 by Bolder-dash, posted 07-29-2010 11:07 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 96 of 109 (570911)
07-29-2010 11:28 AM
Reply to: Message 93 by Bolder-dash
07-29-2010 11:07 AM


I am a troll that is hijacking my own thread?
Apparently...
Although, I wouldn't call it "hijacking" if its your own thread.
Hey, I want to ask you, how come you believe in a soul while at the same time you believe in an unguided process of life.?
Evolution has and does happen, that is a fact. It could be guided, I don't know.
I don't care to explain to you why I believe in souls.
Do you think God decided to inject a soul AFTER he saw that his unguided, completely random system luckily resulted in something that resembled him?
That's a possibility. Or maybe he did guide the evolution to produce what he wanted.
And do you believe in this with absolutely no evidence to come to that conclusion?
There's shit-tons of evidence that evolution has and does occur. Wanna see a neat video?:
Embedding doesn't seem to be working, heres a link to the video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=enrLSfxTqZ0
Those foxes evolved. No ifs ands or buts.
As far as the soul, I believe I have subjective evidence suggesting that it exists, but I'm not sure that's rightly calling it "evidence", so it depends.
Or can you just not really be bothered to think about it?
Far from it! I've got over 4600 posts here over the last 5.5 years. Its safe to say I've bothered to think about this stuff.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by Bolder-dash, posted 07-29-2010 11:07 AM Bolder-dash has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 98 by Huntard, posted 07-29-2010 11:38 AM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 99 by Bolder-dash, posted 07-29-2010 11:41 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 102 of 109 (570918)
07-29-2010 11:48 AM
Reply to: Message 98 by Huntard
07-29-2010 11:38 AM


Catholic Scientist writes:
Those foxes evolved. No ifs ands or buts.
"They're still foxes!" coming up in 5, 4, 3....
Micro-evolution still counts as evolution.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 98 by Huntard, posted 07-29-2010 11:38 AM Huntard has not replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 103 of 109 (570919)
07-29-2010 11:52 AM
Reply to: Message 99 by Bolder-dash
07-29-2010 11:41 AM


I think this sort of depends on what you mean by evolution-evolution as a general concept, or evolution as a Darwinian/natural selection kind of thing (for that there really isn't any evidence at all as it turns out-just lots of conjecture).
Well, evolution (small "e") is an observed fact. The Theory of Evolution is the best explanation for that observation that I have seen. Really, its the only explanation I have.
(for that there really isn't any evidence at all as it turns out-just lots of conjecture).
That's just plain old wrong.
But as you have stated, you don't necessarily believe in a classical Darwinian evolutionary theory
No, I do accept it. There's plenty of evidence to suggest it, and not one single piece of evidence to refute it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 99 by Bolder-dash, posted 07-29-2010 11:41 AM Bolder-dash has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024