Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 80 (8897 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 03-18-2019 1:49 PM
133 online now:
AnswersInGenitals, edge, kjsimons, PaulK, ringo, Tangle (6 members, 127 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: WookieeB
Post Volume:
Total: 848,429 Year: 3,466/19,786 Month: 461/1,087 Week: 51/212 Day: 12/39 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Prev123456
7
Author Topic:   lion vs tiger
Big_Al35
Member
Posts: 384
Joined: 06-02-2010


Message 91 of 91 (572145)
08-04-2010 6:43 AM
Reply to: Message 90 by pandion
08-04-2010 2:33 AM


Re: Another example
The point I was making was that it is easy to see the differences between the different related species when we have the animals alive with us today. We can visibly see the difference between a brown bear and a polar bear. We can also do post mortems on these animals with a 100% certainty that the bones are either a brown bear or a polar bear.

In the case of fossils however, we don't have the physical form available. We don't have access to the DNA. We are unlikely to have the full skeleton even. There is enough variation within the brown bear stock to confuse leg bones, ribs and necks etc with those of a polar bear. This makes finding a common ancestor virtually impossible.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by pandion, posted 08-04-2010 2:33 AM pandion has not yet responded

    
Prev123456
7
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019