The Universe does not progress one day at a time. This is merely our own perception based on our consciousness.
The point is that time passes.
he Big Bang is simply a squeeze point in cosmological evolution, and time simply extends backwards before the Big Bang.
The Big Bang represents a beginning of our own time and 3-dimensional space, and is caused by the physics of a higher dimensional space-time in which our Universe is embedded.
But with these, you are not saying/proving anything, you only move your problem somewhere else.
There is no "before" the Big Bang, there is no "outside" the Universe. The Universe simply "is".
I dont really get what you mean with this (and the paragraph).
---------------------------nwr-------------------------
In logical terms...look for the hidden assumptions.
I totally agree with you, good piece!
About your quantum physics, a piece out of: "In Defense Of The Kalam Cosmological Argument" by William Lane Craig
"The central point to be made here is that the quantum mechanical vacuum on which [virtual particles] depend for their existence is emphatically not nothing. The dynamical properties of vacuous space arise out of its interaction with matter and radiation fields, in the absence of which 'this dynamism of empty space is but a formal abstraction lacking physical reality.' The quantum vacuum is a sea of fluctuating energy which gives rise to virtual particles. Thus, virtual particles can hardly be said to arise without a cause"
Ofcourse this is only one case, but I think that nothing happens without a cause. But what the cause is, if we can even see it, that indeed is doubtful.
Even without the evidence from quantum physics, we could look at assumptions of the form "everything has a cause", and we ought to realize that this is at most a general observation and not anything that we can prove.
That's right it is a falsifiable theorie, all we can do is disprove it we cant prove it. But you also could say, that you can assume its correct untill proven wrong. I dont really see a point in saying that it is wrong (in this case).
The observed expansion of the universe might be reducing entropy.
But if the universe is expanding for an infinite amount of time, the universe would be infinitely big. So I dont think that the entropy would reduce.
"Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love."
- Einstein