Hi Archaeologist,
I noticed with regret this morning that you were suspended a few hours ago. There seems to have been some concern about your volume of messages and how well they were addressing the topic. If you click on the red suspension symbol you'll see the reason Adminnemooseus gave for the suspension, and the moderators will be discussing your situation later today.
I haven't finished reading all the posts from last night, but here's a little information that you might find helpful.
- You seem very sensitive to the way you're treated, but to the moderators it appears that you're being treated pretty much the same way you're treating everyone else. For instance, when you posted this in Message 97:
archaeologist writes:
so, do any of you have legitimate, sioncere, and honest answers to that question?
You were in essence saying that people had been posting illegitimate, insincere and dishonest answers. You've been harping on other people's honesty and objectivity since the day you joined. With your continual questioning of everyone's integrity, what kind of tone were you expecting in the responses?
Please let the moderators handle moderation issues. If you feel you're being treated unfairly then the complaints should be taken to the Report discussion problems here: No.2 thread.
- Your arguments do not usually reference any evidence. In the science forums arguments should be based upon evidence. The Forum Guidelines are fairly general on most points, but rule 4 touches on this:
- Points should be supported with evidence and/or reasoned argumentation. Address rebuttals through the introduction of additional evidence or by enlarging upon the argument. Do not repeat previous points without further elaboration. Avoid bare assertions.
Hope this helps, and we all hope to see you back soon.
Please, no responses to this message in this thread. Responses should be posted to
Report discussion problems here: No.2.
-- | Percy |
| EvC Forum Director |