Register here! Are you creationist or evolutionist?

Autodeist (actually the prove that creationists can be funny - in a nerdy way, but - hey - takes one to catch one):
Rather easy actually: deist is pretty clear (follower/believer in a god); I'd rather spell it theist (as in atheist), but what do I know.
Auto: as in AUTOmatic: I would paraphrase it as "on its own", "without external stimulus"..
Thus, I'd say Autodeist means "Believing in the fact that one is god"..
regards,

Okay, I admit my calculations were off, because I didn't take into account the Earth's molten core. But here's another startling statistic: at the rate she's going, Rei (reg. 9/3/03) is likely to surpass Crash's aggregate total by a week from Tuesday.------------------
I would not let the chickens cross the antidote road because I was already hospitlized for trying to say this!-Brad McFall

Jesus in the Nebula creating the universeWise

Another shocking statistic is that 100% of my messages on this forum are posted under the name Mammuthus!...this may be the clear evidence for design (though intelligent is debatable) we have all been seeking since like 100% of the arguments presented by the ID movement, it is completely irrelevant....that I find two independent subjects with 100% probability cannot be coincidence!I would check my statistics but like Syamsu I have to do laundry so that I may "tend to ignore science" and in any case I might have to make comparisons which could lead to nazism since after all.

Looks more like Che Guevara...what he is doing in the nebula one can only ponder

You'll notice that nowhere in my post (or in my manifesto This Kampf's For You) did I ever actually compare Crashfrog and Rei. My observation merely used statistics to determine meaningfully the rate at which each was posting, and was not meant to suggest anything about subhuman Bosnians. Comparison is indeed tantamount to genocide, just like Darwin said somewhere. I don't even comparison shop, except for detergents. It's another matter entirely if such a comparison was implicit, but I'm not sure what that means so your point is irrelevant.------------------
I would not let the chickens cross the antidote road because I was already hospitlized for trying to say this!-Brad McFall

This is CLEARLY Jesus.He is the ONLY ONE to have claimed to "span the heavens", PLUS the 7000 light years away appears to be within the creation "time frame".Otherwise, you and all evilutionists will HAVE TO explain this Nebulas evolvement.And that WON'T be easyAs evolutionists/atheists think ALL THINGS evolved.Now GET crackin and explain.....Wise

Sorry, it is clearly Che and you cannot prove me wrong for after all Che did say "Hasta la victoria siempr!"Nobody knows how old Che "really" is...should his birth certificate be taken literally or figuratively?I do applaud your attempts at logic however,...such examples of deductive reasoning as you have demonstrated were long thought to be confined to the beer stalls of monster truck rally stadiums but obviously such an artificial limit was only in my mind.

quote:

---

I don't even comparison shop, except for detergents.

---

You goose stepping fascist! I must run now and do laundry WITHOUT comparing detergents so that I can ignore the science of detergent! The "wet penis and vagina" have gone limp from this revelation...Everyone should go away.

Ah, I see Wise's answer to the question 'Are you creationist or evolutionist?' is 'I'm a Muppet'.Please. Don't feed the Muppets.Does this forum have an 'ignore poster' function?

LOL

Kudos to roxrkool for bringing the number of evolutionists up from 20 out of 27 registered to 21 of 28! A clear and even 75%, making my tedious arithmetic so much easier.
Now if anyone makes it 29 registered, they get three "Shame"s and go sit in the corner.
I apologise for my tardiness in posting, but I was writing a Norman Conquest history essay some weeks ago and put in the date 14 October 1066, whereupon Microsoft Word helpfully asked if I would like to see my calendar or schedule a meeting. I realised in horror that I was nearly a thousand years late and had to spend quite some time making it up to the Normans. So you do understand. The rest of my time was spent consuming solid food, since unlike crashfrog and Mammuthus I have not yet evolved to advanced photosynthesis. Natural selection eventually will weed out the unfit and favour those who do not have to spend too much time away from their computers, as detailed in a German scientific study which I saw in a dream somewhere. I would also like to give credit to Alex for defining 'autodeist', but cannot cite him directly since that would involve stressful scrolling and clicking.

quote:

---

since unlike crashfrog and Mammuthus I have not yet evolved to advanced photosynthesis.

---

Actually I have not advanced quite so far..I am merely a semi-obligate parasite who wanders from one non-associated departmental seminar to another to snag coffee and cookies and then leave before the seminar starts. I hope to evolve into fully obligate parasite whereby my students get the coffee and cookies for me without my having to move.

HERE is the scoreYou evilutionists/atheists have made a claim. I jhave clearly refuted your claim with an ACTUAL PHOTO of JESUS in the ACT OF CREATION.It is NOW proven.It is GREATER than any proof evilutionists can EVER offer supporting their belief system.Wise

I SEE creationism as the ONLY truth in light of the Hubble photo.JESUS caught in the very ACT of creation is undisputable evidenceWise