Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,786 Year: 4,043/9,624 Month: 914/974 Week: 241/286 Day: 2/46 Hour: 2/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Intelligent Design ⇒

Intelligent Design vs. Real Science

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Intelligent Design vs. Real Science
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 3 of 142 (575480)
08-20-2010 5:57 AM 		Reply to: Message 1 by Fiver
08-17-2010 5:10 PM

A very good point. I think the thing to remember is that science goes out of it's way to regect the hypothesis and accept the H0.
​
Creation science works to accept the H1 and regect the H0.
​
Creationism has a vested intrest in reaching a priori conclusions so is inherently biased towards it's a priori assumptions.
​
Edited by Larni, : Spellink
This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Fiver, posted 08-17-2010 5:10 PM Fiver has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024