quote:
Perhaps this is why they fall short of aired corroborating evidenced data in this area.
ROTFL ! No, if they used your "evidence" they would look even worse than they already do - even more dishonest and even more obviously unscientific and religious
quote:
Leaders like ICR, do btw, apply some of this evidence that secularists consider non-scientific. Their hypothesis premise, for example, relative to their research would not be considered scientific in the EvC science fora.
The ICR is a YEC group.
Here is what an ICR leader says about the ID movement:
But the ID people (creation by Intelligent Design) insist that these are two different systems and that Intelligent Design is certainly not Scientific Creationismespecially not Biblical Creationism. They feel it best to leave the Bible and the Biblical God out of the argument entirely
Later in the article he accuses the "Intelligent Design Theorists" of "ignoring God".
The ICR is not a "leader" of the ID movement - and agrees with me that the ID movement tries to avoid using religious apologetics like yours altogether.
Edited by PaulK, : Added link
Edited by PaulK, : No reason given.