First, I have good news, and bad.
First the bad, I have no idea what or how we got into Mars. I don't understand why you calculated all that. AT ALL.
I still don't understand why the sun has lost so much rotational energy. You have given variables, such as magnetic coupling, etc., which I fully ACCEPT, but do not understand how it affects the rotation to such a degree, which is what I am waiting for an answer.
I read some information on MC, but it's way over my head.
NOW, for the good news. I have met a friend that is willing to 'tag' me out in regards to this arguement, however I will continue until he makes his profile and jumps in. He's a scientist that spoke at our church a few years ago, and wrote a book on evolution. He has some background in this cosmology jazz.
Now to your points...
"Where do you get this absolutest stuff from?"
I don't. In fact, I believe that alot of data in favour of evolution has been misinterpretation of accurate data.
"Do you argue that all interpretations are equals?" Nope. I think the right interpretation has a slight advantage.
"Shift the the burden of proof much?" Since evolution requires scientific evidence, and my beliefs require faith, yes.
"Let me see if I get this straight. You suggest that all you have to do is a little reading and you can argue cosmology with experts."
Why not? I have been in my field for over 8 years now, and some of the most interesting moments are when new men to my operational field come and and say, "Doesn't this make more sense?". A new guy leaves us experienced guys sitting there going, "How did we not see that?". After 5 years of school and 8 years in the field, this new guy just taught me something. Should I tell him to shut up, because I'm the boss, and I know more, even though he is correct? I think no.
"My logic demands that Occam’s Razor be used." Not sure what that is.