Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,419 Year: 3,676/9,624 Month: 547/974 Week: 160/276 Day: 34/23 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Obama supports Ground Zero mosque. Religious freedom or is he being too PC?
Nij
Member (Idle past 4910 days)
Posts: 239
From: New Zealand
Joined: 08-20-2010


Message 76 of 406 (575511)
08-20-2010 8:49 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by onifre
08-14-2010 4:17 PM


If I recall correctly (television news, and no, it isn't near as biased as stuff you get in the US, before people begin to criticise) Obama never stated support for the mosque.
He explicitly stated that he supported religious freedoms, amongst all of the social and personal freedoms espoused by the Constitution, or something along those lines. He did not make any specific mention of any potential building of any potential centre and as a WH aide added afterwards, it is not El Presidente's place to comment on every local construction project. The Obama-god (lol, JBIC) neither makes nor holds any public position on the development of one particular community centre.
As several here have argued, it is neither a Muslim "victory dance" (many followers of Islam were killed that day too) nor is it an offence to sacred ground (it was a mulitcultural business centre, not a church) nor is it illegal (in fact, the opposite, entirely above board and within bounds) nor is it offensive (to anyone but the fundy right, but they're offended by anything that uses reason or isn't white, straight, Christian, or male; better to ignore them, I think).
Also IIRC, there's already an existing mosque closer to Ground Zero than the planned centre will be, definitely around there somewhere. Any help would be good on this one (already arguing this with another of the previously-mentioned fundy rightists on this point).
Edited by Nij, : To finish a sentence.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by onifre, posted 08-14-2010 4:17 PM onifre has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 77 by jar, posted 08-20-2010 9:26 AM Nij has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 77 of 406 (575519)
08-20-2010 9:26 AM
Reply to: Message 76 by Nij
08-20-2010 8:49 AM


Nij writes:
Also IIRC, there's already an existing mosque closer to Ground Zero than the planned centre will be, definitely around there somewhere. Any help would be good on this one (already arguing this with another of the previously-mentioned fundy rightists on this point).
It's not closer but rather about 4 blocks away.
see Message 13.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 76 by Nij, posted 08-20-2010 8:49 AM Nij has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 78 by Nij, posted 08-20-2010 8:28 PM jar has not replied

Nij
Member (Idle past 4910 days)
Posts: 239
From: New Zealand
Joined: 08-20-2010


Message 78 of 406 (575694)
08-20-2010 8:28 PM
Reply to: Message 77 by jar
08-20-2010 9:26 AM


Tah
Duly noted. However, why not protest that one? 4 blocks is just as bad as 2.
Or as one of the creos was questioned about in another thread, "where is this arbitrary limit and how do you determine it?"
Edited by Nij, : Stupid adverbs.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 77 by jar, posted 08-20-2010 9:26 AM jar has not replied

Taz
Member (Idle past 3312 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 79 of 406 (575969)
08-22-2010 4:15 AM


Protesters to rally against planned Islamic center in New York

onifre
Member (Idle past 2972 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 80 of 406 (576011)
08-22-2010 1:28 PM


A friend of mine made a good point. While yes, there is freedom of religion and the mosque can't be stopped from being built, people are sensitive about it.
Now, asking Muslims to acknowledge this is the same as when they ask us (normal people) to be sensitive to their beliefs, such as, not showing an image of their prophet on TV.
So I think they should build the mosque, but it would be awesome if across the street from the mosque someone built a giant poster of their prophet.
Question is, would they accept someone doing that?
- Oni

Replies to this message:
 Message 81 by jar, posted 08-22-2010 1:32 PM onifre has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 81 of 406 (576012)
08-22-2010 1:32 PM
Reply to: Message 80 by onifre
08-22-2010 1:28 PM


Those two things just don't seem to be comparable. The purpose of the mosque (and it is only incidentally a mosque) is for their use and worship. The sign seems to be solely to aggravate them.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 80 by onifre, posted 08-22-2010 1:28 PM onifre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 82 by onifre, posted 08-22-2010 1:39 PM jar has replied

onifre
Member (Idle past 2972 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 82 of 406 (576013)
08-22-2010 1:39 PM
Reply to: Message 81 by jar
08-22-2010 1:32 PM


The sign seems to be solely to aggravate them.
My point is that freedom is freedom, religious and speech.
If they want religious freedom, then they can't get mad when someone is exercising freedom of speech. No one cares that they're offended, just as they don't care if the mosque offends others. Freedom is freedom.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 81 by jar, posted 08-22-2010 1:32 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 83 by jar, posted 08-22-2010 1:42 PM onifre has replied
 Message 87 by ringo, posted 08-22-2010 2:13 PM onifre has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 83 of 406 (576015)
08-22-2010 1:42 PM
Reply to: Message 82 by onifre
08-22-2010 1:39 PM


Certainly freedom is freedom, and in the US someone would have the right to put up such a poster. I'd still consider that person to be an asshole though.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 82 by onifre, posted 08-22-2010 1:39 PM onifre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 84 by onifre, posted 08-22-2010 1:48 PM jar has replied

onifre
Member (Idle past 2972 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


(1)
Message 84 of 406 (576016)
08-22-2010 1:48 PM
Reply to: Message 83 by jar
08-22-2010 1:42 PM


Certainly freedom is freedom, and in the US someone would have the right to put up such a poster. I'd still consider that person to be an asshole though.
But that's the question: do you think someone would be allowed to do it? They've censored every image on American TV, a highly doubt a poster would be allowed. Someone would point to the fact that it's offensive, but, when someone considers the mosque offensive the Constitution is thrown at them.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 83 by jar, posted 08-22-2010 1:42 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 85 by jar, posted 08-22-2010 2:01 PM onifre has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 85 of 406 (576020)
08-22-2010 2:01 PM
Reply to: Message 84 by onifre
08-22-2010 1:48 PM


Of course they should be allowed to put up such a poster.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 84 by onifre, posted 08-22-2010 1:48 PM onifre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 86 by onifre, posted 08-22-2010 2:12 PM jar has replied

onifre
Member (Idle past 2972 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 86 of 406 (576023)
08-22-2010 2:12 PM
Reply to: Message 85 by jar
08-22-2010 2:01 PM


Should be allowed is one thing, but would they be allowed is my question. We've seen it censored on TV, what would suggest they'd allow a poster of it especially in front of a mosque.
- Oni
Edited by onifre, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 85 by jar, posted 08-22-2010 2:01 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 89 by jar, posted 08-22-2010 2:20 PM onifre has replied
 Message 100 by Rrhain, posted 08-22-2010 7:38 PM onifre has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 433 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 87 of 406 (576024)
08-22-2010 2:13 PM
Reply to: Message 82 by onifre
08-22-2010 1:39 PM


onifre writes:
My point is that freedom is freedom, religious and speech.
You should be free to call your grandmother a fat, ugly old whore, but you should choose not to do it.

Life is like a Hot Wheels car. Sometimes it goes behind the couch and you can't find it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 82 by onifre, posted 08-22-2010 1:39 PM onifre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 88 by onifre, posted 08-22-2010 2:19 PM ringo has replied

onifre
Member (Idle past 2972 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 88 of 406 (576026)
08-22-2010 2:19 PM
Reply to: Message 87 by ringo
08-22-2010 2:13 PM


You should be free to call your grandmother a fat, ugly old whore, but you should choose not to do it.
Why doesn't that apply equally for the people wanting to build the mosque? Shouldn't they choose not to do it?
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 87 by ringo, posted 08-22-2010 2:13 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 90 by ringo, posted 08-22-2010 2:27 PM onifre has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 89 of 406 (576027)
08-22-2010 2:20 PM
Reply to: Message 86 by onifre
08-22-2010 2:12 PM


The Constitution.
If they can find a company willing to rent space to assholes than where is the problem?
Of course, companies don't have to rent space to assholes.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 86 by onifre, posted 08-22-2010 2:12 PM onifre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 91 by onifre, posted 08-22-2010 2:27 PM jar has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 433 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 90 of 406 (576030)
08-22-2010 2:27 PM
Reply to: Message 88 by onifre
08-22-2010 2:19 PM


onifre writes:
Why doesn't that apply equally for the people wanting to build the mosque? Shouldn't they choose not to do it?
It's about personal motivation. If their motivation is to build bridges between Muslims and the rest of society, they should choose to build the mosque. If their motive is to be offensive, they should choose not to. Similarly, if your poster is motivated by a desire to improve relations with Muslims, you should put it up. If your motivation is to thumb your nose at Muslims, you should choose not to.

Life is like a Hot Wheels car. Sometimes it goes behind the couch and you can't find it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 88 by onifre, posted 08-22-2010 2:19 PM onifre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 92 by onifre, posted 08-22-2010 2:31 PM ringo has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024