|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,478 Year: 3,735/9,624 Month: 606/974 Week: 219/276 Day: 59/34 Hour: 2/3 |
Thread ▼ Details |
Member Posts: 3945 From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior) Joined: Member Rating: 10.0 |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The Existence of Jesus Christ | |||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Just a teacher, just a rabbi, blah blah, there were dozens of them in Israel/Palestine at the time, and only one fired up his followers enough to believe in his resurrection enough to go all the way to martyrdom for the belief. Well, I'm not so sure about that. Wasn't there something called "The Jewish Rebelion" or such and a serious enough threat that Roman had to send troops to put it down ending in a seige of some place called Massada or such? I'm old but I seem to remember some mention of it. Seems there was some mention external to the Bible and perhaps even some physical evidence as well? Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Yeah Right.
Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
The passages you link to do actually exist, but as in all of the Talmud, when pulled out of context they can be taken to mean almost anything. The actual context is a really, really long series of discussions related to the issue of sorcery and heresy. The section is literally hundreds of pages long and has reached the stage of "whatifs" and "arguing in the style of." Frankly, I never even thought about connecting them with Jesus before this was brought up. It's an interesting idea, really stretching the point, but would certainly be reasonable in a Talmudic sense.
This is one of the reasons that understanding the Talmudic tradition is so important. The Talmud is a bunch of scholars sitting around a table in a bar late at night. It is every College beer and debate session ever held. It is counting the hairs on an asses nose and the drops of rain as they fall. It is argument by example and a constant debate looking for the exceptions that make the rule. Since the parts quoted are from some of the later Talmud, certainly long after Jesus death and after the fledgling Christianity had taken form and organization, it's not at all unlikely that the character Jesus might be brought up as one example whether he existed or not. However reading the passages in content does not lead to the idea they refered to a specific individual as opposed to a generic class designed to stress a point. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
I'm sorry but does your post have anything to do with my message, the one you're replying to?
Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Since you have stated your position regarding the truthfulness of Bible Scriptures, the only thing I will address are these words of Jesus in John 5:39-40, "You search the Scriptures because you think that in them you have eternal life; it is these that testify about Me; and you are unwilling to come to Me so that you may have eternal life." You do realize that Jesus was not talking about the Bible.
I do not believe most people who come to this web site believe there is such a thing as "eternal life." Most certainly do not believe nor have they received the eternal life that Jesus gives to those who come to Him. That's nice. You are certainly welcome to any beliefs you hold. But what does it have to do with anything being discussed? The subject is whether or not there is evidence for a historical Jesus. It has nothing to do with theology, or divinity, but just "What evidence is there that Jesus really existed?" Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
GDR writes: aul's early writings, including Romans, were written within 20 to 25 years of the resurrection. As I said there would be many around at that time who would have been able to point out that Paul was off base. And many did just that. There is no indication that Paul ever meet Jesus, but only that he believed in the existence of Jesus.
GDR writes: Josephus was writing around 50 years after and wouldn't have including writing about something that had been discredited by eye witnesses. Except that Josephus also only reports that there were people that believed there had been a character named Jesus who they considered to be the Messiah. Neither of those are evidence of the actual existence of Jesus, and even if there was absolute evidence that there had been a historical person named Jesus that did many of the things mentioned in the stories, it still says nothing about the divinity of the character. Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
The vast majority of folk did not believe Paul.
It really is that simple. Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
The evidence is that until Christianity became a State Religion it remained a minor Jewish Sect.
Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
How is any of that relevant or evidence of Jesus?
John 10:10 writes: When applied to sinners who repent according to Acts 2:38-39, they/we receive the gift of God's Holy Spirit. Of course repentance has NOTHING to do with the topic, nor is there any evidence of anyone receiving the gift of God's Holy Spirit.
John 10:10 writes: The proof is in the pudding for those who repent. Except not only have you not offered any proof, you have not even offered any evidence. Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Yada, yada.
How is that evidence of the existence of Jesus? Edited by jar, : fix sub-title Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
John 10:10 writes: Most unbelievers at this forum believe in the causality principle when it comes to scientific principles, but reject it when it comes to spiritual principles. WHY? Because Biblical spiritual principles are for those who believe and receive the truth of WHO JESUS IS. The evidence of WHO JESUS IS is given to those who believe, not to skeptics and unbelievers. Of course, beyond that practice being simply stupid, it is also circular and unnecessary. If someone already believes then any evidence for that belief is unnecessary. If you cannot present the evidence to skeptics and unbelievers you are not following the Great Commission and are failing Jesus. Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
John 10:10 writes: As I shared earlier, the experience I received after walking somewhat shakily with God for 20 years that made Him so real to me was the infilling of the Holy Spirit. How did you test and confirm that it was the Holy Spirit and not an exceptional burrito? What does this have to do with the existence of Jesus Christ? Edited by jar, : fix subtitle Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
John 10:10 writes: jar writes,
quote: quote:Some exceptional burrito our Lord is!!! Sorry John but yet again, you offer no explanation. Did you notice the questions I asked? There were only two of them. First one was "How did you test and confirm that it was the Holy Spirit and not an exceptional burrito?" The second one was "What does this have to do with the existence of Jesus Christ?" Do you have any answers to those two questions? Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Sorry but yet again, that has no informational content.
Here is Acts 2:
quote: What in there are you talking about? What is the test you applied? Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
John 10:10 writes: If you understood what happened in Acts 2 and how it's been happening for the past 2000 years to Believers in the Lord Jesus Christ, you wouldn't be asking all these questions. Perhaps you can explain it to us. Your answer so far is just word salad, content free, "full of sound and fury, signifying nothing." It also has nothing to do with the topic, which is "The Existence of Jesus Christ". Maybe you might actually post an answer that has some meaning and is related to the topic. I did post all of Acts 2 which you claimed covered what happened to you. Could you actually point to the tests in Acts 2 that you used to verify that it was actually the Holy Spirit and not just a bum burrito. Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024