Bolder-dash writes:
So, as moderator, and in accordance with the forum guidelines, please ask them to spell out their evidence clearly, by number, or stop just saying they have given evidence without saying what evidence. If they can only give bacterial evidence then my opening premise still stands. The name for the Theory of Evolution should be changed to the bacteria diet theory.
It takes two to tango. Here's a collection of some of your responses to attempts to describe evidence for you:
assortment of responses from Bolder-dash writes:
...or in an even more ideal world it would be exactly the same thing as having sex with Paris Hilton on a cocaine fueled all night binge, while finding out that you just won two power-ball lotteries while Nicole Richie is filming it all from on top of the headboard-but alas we live in a compromised world-where we have to just stick with boring reality shows.
...
Chimps rarely, if ever, tip the cart girl after buying beers during a round of golf.
...
Ok, I admit that is not a very good criticism of chimps, because in fairness, their pants usually don't have pockets to carry extra change around. Plus they would probably get the percentages wrong anyway.
...
Yes! We can finally agree. The Bacteria Diet it is!! The bacteria proves it, that's why chimps and crashfrog don't have pockets!! Who needs more proof.
...
Which fairy tale world are you discussing?
I was talking about the real evidence, not the ones in your mind.
...
NON-responsive. Its not real because you dreamed it.
I think if you respond to the evidence presented, even if it's just to explain why you don't consider it evidence, that it would help move the discussion constructively forward. This is your thread, try to make the most of it.
Please, no responses to this message in this thread. Problems with discussion should be taken to the
Report discussion problems here: No.2.
-- | Percy |
| EvC Forum Director |