Intelligent Design vs. Real Science

No more than the SCOTUS can describe pornography.There are things that we can say are definitely alive, like most family, and things we can say are definitely not alive, like rocks, but at some point the difference is so small and subjective that we cannot say definitely or can only say that at times the thing is alive and at other times it is not.

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

I look forward to you presenting that evidence as opposed to simply asserting that such evidence exists.

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

How did he do that Buz, did he move genes around using a pipette or just his fingers. How do that work Buz, what exactly is it in that magic breath that is life giving? What are those properties? What is their chemical makeup? No Buz, the issue is that there is a model in real science while there is NO model or even knowledge to be gained in Inept Design.Try providing a model.ID will become scientific when, and only when, a model is presented and tested that explains how the designer interacts to control outcomes. Of course, once that happens the designer is no longer relevant except as an historical footnote or in the case of product liability suits.Edited by jar, : add last paragraph

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

When you present the model for how the designer intervenes then perhaps we can discuss it. Simply continuing to say it is the same model means nothing.

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

And so you have no model to present.Sorry Charlie, you don't even get the worm.

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

We have that model Buz, it is called the Theory of Evolution".Now present yours. If and when you present such evidence we will examine it. So far ALL the so called evidence you have presented has been refuted. HUH?Word salad. I don't even know of any evidence there is some life giving breath or what any of the rest of that alleged sentence means. More word salad Buz, utter nonsense.If and when you ever present any "corroborating evidence" THEN it can be examined.

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

Order is a conclusion as well.But the real issue is the one that Dawn has always avoided addressing and only claimed he doesn't have to address.Currently science has found and demonstrated the method and mechanisms, the model, that explains the evolution of the variety of life we see today.Dawn has consistently refused to address the method and the mechanism, the model, that explains how his imagined designer influences and interferes to create the variety of life we see today.Dawn simply has nothing and has never talked sense.

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

Method and model Dawn, what is your method and model;.Until you present that claiming ID is science is simply bullshit.What is the method and model that the designer uses to influence and direct evolution?Method and model Dawn, what is the method and model.

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

Method and model Dawn, what is your method and model;.Until you present that claiming ID is science is simply bullshit.What is the method and model that the designer uses to influence and direct evolution?Method and model Dawn, what is the method and model.And No, when it comes to ID Behe is not doing science.So you are answered now ...Method and model Dawn, what is your method and model;.Until you present that claiming ID is science is simply bullshit.What is the method and model that the designer uses to influence and direct evolution?Method and model Dawn, what is the method and model.

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!