New name for evolution, "The Bacteria Diet"

Mutations can be demonstrated to create new structures. As you know, when the generation gaps are very brief, we can witness significant changes in the lab. with your favourites, the bacteria.When generations are longer, there's another type of experiment we can make. We can cheat natural selection by selecting variations that we choose. In this way, we can see the potential of the random mutations to produce novelty far more quickly, and it illustrates the point that it's actually conservative natural selection that puts the brakes on evolution more than the variation produced by mutations.So, you claim that mutations can't produce new structures. And, as usual, you're wrong. Mutations have produced all the edible stuff from the first plant. So, now you can add plants to your bacteria theory, and, if you actually understood the implications of what Taq is trying to explain to you, you'd be able to add animals as well.

Weren't you talking about new structures not coming from mutations, amongst other things? Have you recently realised that they do?

You could try thinking along the lines that, if only a small percentage are advantageous, then that would be a clear indication of general randomness. And you could certainly consider the detrimental ones as being random. Also, most are fairly close to neutral, and in their immediate effects, have no apparent point to them. Which would inevitably lead to differential reproduction, wouldn't it? You shouldn't project your own inability to read evidence onto others. Biologists can look at the genomes of individuals in the same species, and see that the differences are the results of types of mutations they know from the lab.When they've established common ancestry between two species, they can do the same thing. The quantity of mutations that make up the differences is just larger.Even things that rarely go to fixation in a population group, like our fused chromosome 2, occur quite frequently. There are lots of perfectly healthy humans walking around today with a different number of chromosomes than the rest of us. I've already shown you in a post above how you can easily extend that to plants.I'll help you to extend it to another Kingdom, as well, because there's plenty of research on fungi like this example.Spontaneous Mutations in Diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae | Genetics | Oxford AcademicSo now you've got the theory of evolution of bacteria, fungi and plants + evidence of common descent + transitional fossils + plus evidence of mutation and selection in animal genomes etc.Soon, you'll end up with the modern theory of evolution, and realise that the rest of us are just quicker than you.