yes it does, read Gen 1:30
Gen 1:30 says....
30 Also, to every beast of the earth, to every bird of the air, and to everything that creeps on the earth, in which there is life, I have given every green herb for food; and it was so.
Please explain to me how this explains that evolution is not part of God's master plan.
Evolution, or specializations among like species, is a scientific fact. What you fail to see is God's glory in his own works.
that is where you are wrong again neither exist nor did God use them. you forget how genes are designed to work and they do not require any form of evolution. evolutionists are just trying to steal God's glory.
So there's a distinction between how genes work and evolution as an engine of change? You REALLY need to explain this one because if you're saying there's another path towards macro/micro changes within and across species, you need to get it down on paper and prepare to receive your Nobel prize.
prove it for i know that is false as we have the gospels recording Jesus healing the lopped off ear of a person who came to arrest him.
what you mean to say is you have willfully chosen to distort the idea of healing to justify your unbelief. amputees are healed, just not in the way they want. if the limb didn't come off, they would die. if the limb didn't heal from the amputation, they would die.
God heals amputees but He heals them in the way He WANTS because He knows that the amputee is asking for restoration not healing.
the rest of the comments are not worth replying to as they come form those who are not sincere and just want to make trouble.
My unbelief IS justified by the fact that in all of recorded history, no man has ever had a limb restored after an amputation. The Bible is not an authoritative source on whether amputees have been restored or not. The Bible is filled with fantastic stories that are not supported by reality (Jonah and the Whale). And lest you forget, Luke 22:50 simply says that Malchus was "healed". It does not say that he was restored. There's a big difference and you have chosen to use this passage to prove that God does indeed restore amputees. Sorry, you can't have it both ways. If God can "restore" (your words) Malchus, he can restore others, but of course there is absolutely no evidence for this outside of the Bible.
My disbelief is well justified. God chooses to heal/restore in an arbitrary and capricious way. More specifically, God chooses to heal/restore only those ailments that may move into remission on their own.
By the way, I'm still waiting for that "proof" of God's existence.
Cheers,
--Caldron68
Edited by caldron68, : Edited for syntax.