Did you watch the dvd segment which I cited? Mollar explains that the coral reefs common to the gulf body of water were orderly and closely knit in larger beds whereas the floor region which he researched and photographed was a scattered junk yard like litter of blotches of coral crusted formations, a few which resembled wheels and axels.
Which offers NO evidence that they were chariot wheels. He presents ZERO evidence there was even one chariot wheel. Read what you write and what they said in the video. There were NO Chariot wheels. Was even a single sample taken?
Given the quantity of formations and considering that several millenniums of time had done it's toll along with gulf currents, etc, one should assume that a signle ship wreck of a few charriots from some other source would be very unlikely.
But there was no evidence there was even one chariot wheel. And the whole area was Egypt. Guess how the Egyptian troops moved over the many, many centuries they ruled that area? There were Egyptian troops and chariots there for many, many centuries.
Keep in mind, as well, all of the corroborating evidence that led the explorers to that site in the first place, it being the only site which fit the corroborating data relative to it.
But you have presented no corroborating evidence even though there is a thread open and waiting for you.
We are waiting anxiously for you to present any evidence.
Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!