Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 85 (8950 total)
22 online now:
AZPaul3, PaulK, Tangle, vimesey (4 members, 18 visitors)
Newest Member: Mikee
Post Volume: Total: 867,209 Year: 22,245/19,786 Month: 808/1,834 Week: 308/500 Day: 7/64 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Archaeologist's evidence for creation
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 2532 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 1 of 8 (579714)
09-05-2010 7:08 PM


Archaeologist has stated in numerous topics that he has evidence of creation. As of now I have yet to see any. I am starting this topic per instructions from Adminnemooseus in the topic The Texas State Board of Education and textbooks.
So arch PLEASE now show this evidence.

Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Fix some code, take the " off the end of the topic title.


There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002

Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969

Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008


Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by Omnivorous, posted 09-05-2010 11:09 PM bluescat48 has not yet responded
 Message 4 by archaeologist, posted 09-06-2010 5:06 AM bluescat48 has not yet responded

  
Adminnemooseus
Director
Posts: 3911
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 2 of 8 (579756)
09-05-2010 10:23 PM


Thread Copied from Proposed New Topics Forum
Thread copied here from the Archaeologist's evidence for creation thread in the Proposed New Topics forum.

I would have preferred that Archaeologist had started this topic, but I guess this will work as well (or as poorly).

I encourage those of the evolution side to show some restraint - Try not to pile on with redundant content replies to Archaeologist.

Adminnemooseus

Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Add post-promotion comment.


  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3811
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005


(2)
Message 3 of 8 (579762)
09-05-2010 11:09 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by bluescat48
09-05-2010 7:08 PM


Don't hold your breath.
Hypothesis: This thread already displays all the evidence archy has to offer.


Have you ever been to an American wedding? Where's the vodka? Where's the marinated herring?!
-Gogol Bordello

Real things always push back.
-William James


This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by bluescat48, posted 09-05-2010 7:08 PM bluescat48 has not yet responded

  
archaeologist
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 8 (579808)
09-06-2010 5:06 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by bluescat48
09-05-2010 7:08 PM


wow, you finallygot around to doing this. you are slow as i had one board a couple years ago post over 50 seperate threads about me {lost track at that number}.

i gave you the evidence already i am not going to waste my time or energy rehashing what i have already said.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by bluescat48, posted 09-05-2010 7:08 PM bluescat48 has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by hotjer, posted 09-06-2010 6:25 AM archaeologist has not yet responded
 Message 6 by Larni, posted 09-06-2010 6:37 AM archaeologist has not yet responded
 Message 7 by Admin, posted 09-06-2010 10:47 AM archaeologist has not yet responded

  
hotjer
Member (Idle past 2887 days)
Posts: 113
From: Denmark
Joined: 04-02-2010


Message 5 of 8 (579814)
09-06-2010 6:25 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by archaeologist
09-06-2010 5:06 AM


I bet you also think the moon landing is a fraud and think it is a trick by the scientific community (despite it does not make sense).

Back to the topic:

Please, show the guy where you have showed your evidence. Personally, I have never seen anything else than preaching. I am also a little eager to hear whether you actually have any evidences or arguments for your opinion.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by archaeologist, posted 09-06-2010 5:06 AM archaeologist has not yet responded

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 3990
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(2)
Message 6 of 8 (579816)
09-06-2010 6:37 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by archaeologist
09-06-2010 5:06 AM


If you present you evidence one more time in this thread it may shut those dang evolutionist up, for once.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by archaeologist, posted 09-06-2010 5:06 AM archaeologist has not yet responded

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 12653
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 3.0


Message 7 of 8 (579856)
09-06-2010 10:47 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by archaeologist
09-06-2010 5:06 AM


archaeologist writes:

wow, you finallygot around to doing this. you are slow as i had one board a couple years ago post over 50 seperate threads about me {lost track at that number}.

The main topic of this board is the creation/evolution debate. Members whose behavior becomes the center of attention and serves as a distraction from the primary topic will receive increasing attention from moderators.


--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by archaeologist, posted 09-06-2010 5:06 AM archaeologist has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by Minnemooseus, posted 09-06-2010 4:54 PM Admin has acknowledged this reply

  
Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3781
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 5.2


Message 8 of 8 (579928)
09-06-2010 4:54 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by Admin
09-06-2010 10:47 AM


Archaeologist's "Creation as Science" topic
The Archaeologist only messages

Archaeologist, at message 7 of the above cited, writes:

***note: i had asked that this be placed in a non-scientific forum so I could participate but I see that request was denied. so since i have to defend my point of view, it looks like i will have to once again appear in this section. BUT be advised, do not expect me to present evidence the secular scientific way.***

I've read through Archaeologist's messages and his evidence for creation seems to consist of:


  • The things of evolution (and other sciences) can't work (implying the validity of creationism as a default).

  • The Bible says creation happened, therefore it did happen.

If anyone finds more than that, please point it out.

Now, contrary to many/most of the evolution side, I think the creation default would carry some weight IF a scientific alternative could not be found and supported.

Perhaps this topic should be closed, with any discussion being diverted to the above cited topic.

Archaeologist has his own site, which includes a discussion forum. Members might want to take a stab at that forum (same type brick wall, different location).

Moose


This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Admin, posted 09-06-2010 10:47 AM Admin has acknowledged this reply

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019