Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 62 (9024 total)
49 online now:
Minnemooseus (Adminnemooseus), PaulK (2 members, 47 visitors)
Newest Member: Moe's URL Addresss
Post Volume: Total: 882,822 Year: 468/14,102 Month: 468/294 Week: 224/136 Day: 0/32 Hour: 0/0

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   14C Calibration and Correlations
Posts: 19891
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 8.7

Message 26 of 59 (580900)
09-12-2010 9:46 AM
Reply to: Message 23 by faith24
09-11-2010 10:45 PM

faith24 writes:

Whether it is constant or not, that can be debatable.

Sure it can be debatable. If the evidence for a constant decay rate were equivocal then the conclusion that the decay rate is constant would be debatable. But the evidence for a constant decay rate is unequivocal. Even the RATE group discovered that it is unequivocal.

In case it wasn't clear from Coyote's post, the RATE project was a creationist research effort conducted under the auspices of the Institute for Creation Research and the Creation Research Society.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by faith24, posted 09-11-2010 10:45 PM faith24 has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021