i have no problems with being suspended or having moderators do bannings. I just wish they would apply the rules to everyone evenly. I am told to 'support my comments' then see so many responses to my words without support.
the burden of proof is not solely upon me, people who have contrary arguments need to support and prove their position just as i am reguired to do.
it is not my fault that other people reject my evidence or dismiss it without consideration. Evidence is evidence and after awhile when it is continually rejected and more is demanded, one just won't do it anymore.
the Bible is evidence, it is the only eye witness document of the past and the only verifiable document for origins and other events. it is not my fault that the secularists reject it and refuse to consider it evidence. {it is not their call to make}
it is not my fault that secular science is limited and designed to look for the wrong answers in the wrong places. you cannot discuss with someone on a topic like gold, when they are mining for lead and looking at lead for their answers to the gold supply.
when secularists stop manipulating the playing field to receive only the answers they want to hear, then maybe a discussion could take place, but that would mean that the secularist would have to be honest in their responses and points. {which few can achieve}
i have supplied evidence, quotes, even from secular sorces but it is never good enough so if you do not like my posts then i expect to be banned shortly because there is only so much evidence in existence and if that isn't good enough for the secularist then tough titties. God requires faith as part fo the equation and that is going to be constant throughout all discussions with christians.
secular science has no footing, no authority to demand anything else. it is a usurper in the theological field and does not belong. this does not mean that science has no part of the religious life, it just means that the secular version is moot and not allowed.
if you want to discuss with me, then discuss but do it honestly and with credible links to legitimate references so i can refute what you say. I will provide links as well or book titles as i prefer books to the internet so you can see i am not the only one who thinks that way.
it is not my fault