Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,455 Year: 3,712/9,624 Month: 583/974 Week: 196/276 Day: 36/34 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Biblically, Was Adam The First Man?
DC85
Member
Posts: 876
From: Richmond, Virginia USA
Joined: 05-06-2003


Message 71 of 109 (582007)
09-18-2010 3:44 PM
Reply to: Message 69 by Buzsaw
09-18-2010 3:37 PM


RE: Talking Snakes
Dinos are the only evidence of serpents having long legs. Go figure. Scriptural verification is verified by archeological observation.
How are defining "serpent"? How does the Bible define "serpent"? Dinosaurs are certainly not snakes they aren't Lizards or Crocodilians either

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by Buzsaw, posted 09-18-2010 3:37 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 73 by ringo, posted 09-18-2010 3:54 PM DC85 has not replied

  
DC85
Member
Posts: 876
From: Richmond, Virginia USA
Joined: 05-06-2003


Message 83 of 109 (582023)
09-18-2010 4:45 PM
Reply to: Message 79 by Buzsaw
09-18-2010 4:35 PM


RE: Biblical Serpents
iblically, serpent was a relative term, relative to context. The Genesis context in question is the pre-cursed serpent kind which had not yet been cursed to be close to or down to the ground belly crawlers.
Whatever you believe, this is what is clearly implied in the Genesis record which emphatically implies that the pre-cursed serpents were not belly crawlers.
A Dinosaur isn't a snake with legs.... So your explanation still is absurd.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 79 by Buzsaw, posted 09-18-2010 4:35 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024