Why is it that God couldn't have made Creation with evolution?

"How were such titanic blocks of stone brought to the top of the mountain from the quarries many miles away?yu would be surprised what a few ropes some material to role somthing on and a few oxses and a cupple of men can movestone tool or implement that would cut or chip the andesiteoh no's diamonds are the hardest material known to man how ever can we cut and shape them so they can look preaty on ringsdiamonds are polished whit diamonds, and if there is no other tool to cut and shape andesite im guessing andesite would do, to cut it get some sand something similar to a saw it needs no teeth and cut awayHow were they raised and put in place?
give me a point to stand on and i can move the Earth (ever hear about something like leverage)

well the problem whit that is that the world could have created itself following natural laws so adding a deity in to the mix complicates matters and do to occam's Razor the simplest explanation is usually right. we cannot whit a 100% certanty god did not create the world we can say it is fare more probable that the world caused itself Occoms razor | Article about Occoms razor by The Free Dictionarythe same goes whit god guiding evolution, we know it can happen on its own so it most probably did, invoking deities complicates matters so it is more probable that it happened on its own.to put it simple witch of these in this situation is more probablea vase is broken in your living room the doors are locked and the only one home was your kid.A) the kid broke the vase
B) a stranger broke in broke the vase then left leaving no trace or evidence of him being therewhitout other evidence the logical conclusion is that the kid broke the vase well i agree whit you there and the same goes for other religius scriptures you cant use your own wive point if you read those aincent scriptures you have to put your self in the shoes and mindset of the author Edited by frako, : No reason given.Edited by frako, : No reason given.

25 a day go extinct if i am not mistaken mostly do to man's actions

i agree it is a way more intelligent approach, because you cannot disprove it like you cannot disprove the stranger braking the vase in my earlier example, he could have worn gloves (no fingerprints), and he could have picked the lock whit plastic picks that leave no trace of tampering and re locked the door the same way after he left. absence of evidence is not evidence of absence so there is a possibility that the stranger did it, the same could be said for god in the big bang theory or evolution it is possible though given the evidence it is a very remote possibility and it is impossible for science to disprove it though an educated guess of science would be no god whit these facts as would the jury say the kid did it there was no stranger