Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,819 Year: 3,076/9,624 Month: 921/1,588 Week: 104/223 Day: 2/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Atheist evolutionists: How far will you allow yourselves of sexual perversities?
onifre
Member (Idle past 2951 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


(1)
Message 121 of 152 (582543)
09-21-2010 10:10 PM
Reply to: Message 117 by Yrreg
09-21-2010 5:50 PM


Re: Well. if you guys atheists have to be defensive with your sex practices, that is...
And that shows that you do have a transcendental moral heart and mind.
Unlike our animal fellow living things.
Yeah but they sure are entertaining!
If you haven't watched this before, you're welcome.
And I'm pretty sure a human has mouth raped a frog before too. SO if it's not us atheist, it must be you guys raping frogs.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 117 by Yrreg, posted 09-21-2010 5:50 PM Yrreg has not replied

  
dwise1
Member
Posts: 5930
Joined: 05-02-2006
Member Rating: 5.8


(2)
Message 122 of 152 (582550)
09-22-2010 1:57 AM
Reply to: Message 117 by Yrreg
09-21-2010 5:50 PM


Re: Well. if you guys atheists have to be defensive with your sex practices, that is...
Well. if you guys atheists have to be defensive with your sex practices, that is fine by me.
What defensive? We, at least, have been honest and straight-forward in our responses. Just because you're obsessed with sexual perversions doesn't mean that we should be.
And that shows that you do have a transcendental moral heart and mind.
No, just moral. "Transcendental morality" (TM) was a purely hypothetical seventh stage of Kohlberg's theory of moral development; IOW, no evidence that such a thing even exists (for that matter, Kohlberg couldn't even find empirical evidence for his sixth stage, "moral reasoning is based on abstract reasoning using universal ethical principles", so even he emphasized that a seventh stage was purely speculative). So any talk of TM is purely speculative, such that definitive conclusions such as you had just jumped to are completely groundless. If you disagree, then please give a reasoned argument; I've seen your other posts, so I'll not be holding my breath awaiting that reasoned argument.
Using Kohlberg, TM is not at all necessary for us to not be as obsessed as a Christian in sexual perversions. Conventional stages 3 and 4 (where most adults and adolescents are: 3.Interpersonal accord and conformity (Social norms), and 4.Authority and social-order maintaining orientation (Law and order morality)) up through post-conventional stages 5 and 6 (5.Social contract orientation and 6. Universal ethical principles (Principled conscience)) would more than account for our morality. No need to invoke some non-existent purely hypothetical 7th stage.
Also, believe it or not (obviously not, since you are obsessed), a lot of that stuff just does not interest us. Sure, we'll look to see what it is, but that doesn't mean that we want to do it. When I was last in Germany (1974), I picked up a book on German obscene terms (Sex im Volksmund: Der obszne Wortschatz der Deutschen, collected through 10 years of field research; unfortunately, the author gave no indication of which fields those were). There are practices mentioned in there that I would have never in my wildest dreams have even started to imagine existed. Would I want to go out and engage in those practices? Uh, no, they just don't appeal to me. A matter of taste, something which I guess Christians must lack.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 117 by Yrreg, posted 09-21-2010 5:50 PM Yrreg has not replied

  
Tram law
Member (Idle past 4705 days)
Posts: 283
From: Weed, California, USA
Joined: 08-15-2010


Message 123 of 152 (582646)
09-22-2010 1:38 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by Huntard
09-07-2009 12:26 PM


What? Saying pussy or cock in this context gets you upset? Grow a pair!
I just had a wild thought.
If you're willing, but your penis is not, does that mean your cock is a pussy?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by Huntard, posted 09-07-2009 12:26 PM Huntard has not replied

  
Tram law
Member (Idle past 4705 days)
Posts: 283
From: Weed, California, USA
Joined: 08-15-2010


Message 124 of 152 (582648)
09-22-2010 1:42 PM
Reply to: Message 119 by Percy
09-21-2010 6:33 PM


Re: Well. if you guys atheists have to be defensive with your sex practices, that is...
What types of sex between consenting adults should be considered perversities and off limits, and why?
My best guess is that he believes that the only sex that is not perverse is sex between a married couple with the intent of procreation only.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 119 by Percy, posted 09-21-2010 6:33 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 125 by frako, posted 09-22-2010 3:16 PM Tram law has not replied

  
frako
Member (Idle past 306 days)
Posts: 2932
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


Message 125 of 152 (582657)
09-22-2010 3:16 PM
Reply to: Message 124 by Tram law
09-22-2010 1:42 PM


Re: Well. if you guys atheists have to be defensive with your sex practices, that is...
my girl would run of in a month or sooner if i thought that way

This message is a reply to:
 Message 124 by Tram law, posted 09-22-2010 1:42 PM Tram law has not replied

  
menes777
Member (Idle past 4319 days)
Posts: 36
From: Wichita, KS, USA
Joined: 01-25-2010


Message 126 of 152 (584396)
10-01-2010 4:06 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Yrreg
09-04-2009 3:49 PM


Was that gun loaded?
This seems like a loaded question to me.
If the atheist answers "If it bleeds it breeds" or "If it's a hole I am on a roll", you can sit back and say "Yep I know, those damned atheists will do anything and anybody"
If the atheists answers "Only at night with the lights off with my wife and only for procreation", you can sit back and say "Don't you wonder where you got that morality from?"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Yrreg, posted 09-04-2009 3:49 PM Yrreg has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 285 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 127 of 152 (584465)
10-01-2010 11:32 PM


Invent A New Perversion?
I want a new perversion to practice just so's I can annoy Yrreg and his imaginary friend. Any suggestions?

Replies to this message:
 Message 128 by frako, posted 10-02-2010 4:43 AM Dr Adequate has not replied
 Message 132 by Larni, posted 10-02-2010 2:34 PM Dr Adequate has not replied
 Message 138 by Omnivorous, posted 10-02-2010 6:20 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
frako
Member (Idle past 306 days)
Posts: 2932
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


Message 128 of 152 (584484)
10-02-2010 4:43 AM
Reply to: Message 127 by Dr Adequate
10-01-2010 11:32 PM


Re: Invent A New Perversion?
ufff that is a hard one
orgies- the romans did that
pedofilia- the Greeks did that
incest - the egyptians
other participants lifting the woman up and down- the chinise did that
everything in the karmasutra- done by the hindus
animal sex -been done
machine sex- been done
on a plane- been done you can charter planes for that purpose
aha found one in space or in 0 gravity has not yet been done by humans

This message is a reply to:
 Message 127 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-01-2010 11:32 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 129 by Coragyps, posted 10-02-2010 1:57 PM frako has replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 735 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 129 of 152 (584541)
10-02-2010 1:57 PM
Reply to: Message 128 by frako
10-02-2010 4:43 AM


Re: Invent A New Perversion?
in space or in 0 gravity has not yet been done by humans
You can't know that, Frako, unless you've been on the International Space Station and watching everyone there for the last twelve years.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 128 by frako, posted 10-02-2010 4:43 AM frako has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 130 by jar, posted 10-02-2010 1:59 PM Coragyps has not replied
 Message 131 by frako, posted 10-02-2010 2:11 PM Coragyps has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 395 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 130 of 152 (584542)
10-02-2010 1:59 PM
Reply to: Message 129 by Coragyps
10-02-2010 1:57 PM


Re: Invent A New Perversion?
Hell, it's tough enough to find one that's missing from the alt.sex newsgroup.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 129 by Coragyps, posted 10-02-2010 1:57 PM Coragyps has not replied

  
frako
Member (Idle past 306 days)
Posts: 2932
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


Message 131 of 152 (584543)
10-02-2010 2:11 PM
Reply to: Message 129 by Coragyps
10-02-2010 1:57 PM


Re: Invent A New Perversion?
good point so scratch the 0 gravity
i doubt anyone fuc*** a whale before, 3 m long Jonson, and balls that weigh a tone. he can try that
i also have doubts if anyone did a bee hive before
the biggest gang bang was 300 men and one woman though only 70 arived and took turns till the number reached 251 acts you can try and beat that or turn it around and make it 300 women on one man if you satisfy them all in one day i will praise you as god
you can try to beat the world's biggest distance for a Jet of Semen 6m

This message is a reply to:
 Message 129 by Coragyps, posted 10-02-2010 1:57 PM Coragyps has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 133 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-02-2010 2:58 PM frako has replied
 Message 136 by Coragyps, posted 10-02-2010 5:27 PM frako has not replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 164 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 132 of 152 (584545)
10-02-2010 2:34 PM
Reply to: Message 127 by Dr Adequate
10-01-2010 11:32 PM


Re: Invent A New Perversion?
Having sex with one's regular partner?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 127 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-01-2010 11:32 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 134 by frako, posted 10-02-2010 4:12 PM Larni has replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 285 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 133 of 152 (584548)
10-02-2010 2:58 PM
Reply to: Message 131 by frako
10-02-2010 2:11 PM


Re: Invent A New Perversion?
i also have doubts if anyone did a bee hive before
Mellisophila? That exists, sorry.
I wonder if there's anything left that hasn't been sexualized.
Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 131 by frako, posted 10-02-2010 2:11 PM frako has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 135 by frako, posted 10-02-2010 4:15 PM Dr Adequate has not replied
 Message 147 by bluegenes, posted 10-03-2010 8:18 AM Dr Adequate has not replied
 Message 148 by onifre, posted 10-03-2010 11:45 AM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
frako
Member (Idle past 306 days)
Posts: 2932
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


Message 134 of 152 (584555)
10-02-2010 4:12 PM
Reply to: Message 132 by Larni
10-02-2010 2:34 PM


Re: Invent A New Perversion?
Having sex with one's regular partner?
Oh my God! you pervert how can your devius perverted mind come up whit something so perverted this a pure evil act.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 132 by Larni, posted 10-02-2010 2:34 PM Larni has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 137 by Larni, posted 10-02-2010 5:32 PM frako has not replied

  
frako
Member (Idle past 306 days)
Posts: 2932
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


Message 135 of 152 (584557)
10-02-2010 4:15 PM
Reply to: Message 133 by Dr Adequate
10-02-2010 2:58 PM


Re: Invent A New Perversion?
hows a bout blow.....obs from gators

This message is a reply to:
 Message 133 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-02-2010 2:58 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024