A highly qualified and respected scientist makes the point that there is an agenda in play, and a lack of scientific objectivity in the institution that is charged with researching the issue.
He may be respected, I dunno, I never heard of him before, but unless his research involve climate change then he's not "highly qualified." Just sayin'.
-
This highly respected scientist is called a fool, a denialist. a good scientist gone bad, an aggrieved child and that his is not knowledgeable and is going senile.
Huh? What? Wait a minute! This "highly respected" scientist has just called the many, many other highly respected and very much more qualified scientists fools and crooks and people who are only in it for the money.
It could be that he is simply wrong about this, but I think that when someone is so publicly and spectacularly wrong then they are going to attract a bit of name calling.
You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists. -- Abbie Hoffman
™ Version 4.2
(1)