This is a book that deserves to be widely read, because it presents important issues in a way that is easily understood - but does not neglect significant details.
I am a big fan of Ben Goldacre and his weekly column in the Guardian newspaper.
There is also a related website dedicated to debunking false scientific claims made in the mainstream media.
Bad Science
To read it as a simple skewering of alternative medicine (chiefly "nutitionists" and the supplement industry), Big Pharma, and newspapers - although it is that - is to underrate it.
In my opinion the book "Trick or Treatment" by Simon Singh is a more comprehensive analysis of alternative therapies and their flaws.
Goldacre's "Bad Science" is a better and more generalised exposition of the nature of evidence and the tricks and/or self deceptions invoked by the media and advertising industries to give credence to their claims and stories.
Another related (though frankly less readable) account of such practices as unwittingly applied by us all in everyday life is the book "Irrationality" by Stuart Sutherland.
Reason to be cheerful | Books | The Guardian
More importantly it is about the importance of evidence - and how to understand it. It is about bad thinking - and deceptive presentations, used by those who would convince us. These topics are of general relevance - and of obvious importance to the issue of evolution versus creationism.
Absolutely.
The chosen examples are biased towards medicine and the British experience - because the author is a medical doctor, writing a weekly column for a British newspaper.
It is true that many of the examples analysed in detail are derived from high profile stories in the British media over the last few years.
But this fact does little to diminish the value of the book to foreign readers. The underlying points affect us all.
I am glad that you thought so and am delighted that you enjoyed the book.
I have been reading a lot on the nature of evidence recently and I too highy recommend this book to anyone with an interest in such matters.
Edited by Straggler, : No reason given.