Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,356 Year: 3,613/9,624 Month: 484/974 Week: 97/276 Day: 25/23 Hour: 3/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Eternal Life (thanks, but no thanks)
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1486 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 151 of 296 (586817)
10-15-2010 1:43 AM
Reply to: Message 150 by Bolder-dash
10-14-2010 11:38 PM


And then I finally exhaled with a great sigh of understanding, when I finally realized that no, it can not be possible that anyone, with even the least imagination or reasoning skills necessary to perform just the rudimentary requirements of life such as preparing food, or bathing one's self, could possibly be so delusional as to believe that they could forecast their state of mind in an unknowable state.
Well, think it through, Bolder-dash. I know you're not very good at it but try anyway. If the mind of mine that is in heaven is so truly unknowable then exactly in what sense is it me?
The promise is not that some being named "Crashfrog", with all my memories and experiences but completely different than me is going to heaven - the promise is that I'm going. So the mental state can't be unknowable - or else it can't be me!
You just think it's unknowable, because that's the only circumstance under which you can imagine eternity as anything but a nightmare - when it's not you who's going to experience it, but someone like you, but "unknowable." (Since you can't figure out how anybody else would want that, either.)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 150 by Bolder-dash, posted 10-14-2010 11:38 PM Bolder-dash has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 152 by Bolder-dash, posted 10-15-2010 2:41 AM crashfrog has not replied

  
Bolder-dash
Member (Idle past 3649 days)
Posts: 983
From: China
Joined: 11-14-2009


Message 152 of 296 (586826)
10-15-2010 2:41 AM
Reply to: Message 151 by crashfrog
10-15-2010 1:43 AM


Not to stray far off topic, but do you know, is there a place to nominate the stupidest post of the month on this forum?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 151 by crashfrog, posted 10-15-2010 1:43 AM crashfrog has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 155 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-15-2010 4:41 AM Bolder-dash has not replied
 Message 157 by Omnivorous, posted 10-15-2010 8:07 AM Bolder-dash has not replied

  
Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 153 of 296 (586834)
10-15-2010 3:42 AM
Reply to: Message 150 by Bolder-dash
10-14-2010 11:38 PM


And then I finally exhaled with a great sigh of understanding, when I finally realized that no, it can not be possible that anyone, with even the least imagination or reasoning skills necessary to perform just the rudimentary requirements of life such as preparing food, or bathing one's self, could possibly be so delusional as to believe that they could forecast their state of mind in an unknowable state.
The thread is about trying to persuade me that Eternal Life is to be anticipated as something to look forward to. I agree it is unknowable - but is there any scenario at all which would be something to look forward to?
How odd though, that the frying pan smack still hurt like hell. I had thought that cracking virtual frying pans to the skull would hurt a lot less and produce much less bruising in a dream state than it does in reality (boy was I wrong!) Oh well, at least I still have this text in front of me, to confirm beyond a shadow of a doubt that none of this silliness could possibly be real. The lucidity of my dreams is fascinating though.
If you'd feel like addressing the points raised, rather than sarcastically attempting to dismiss them - I'll be here.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 150 by Bolder-dash, posted 10-14-2010 11:38 PM Bolder-dash has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 154 by Bolder-dash, posted 10-15-2010 3:59 AM Modulous has seen this message but not replied
 Message 162 by Buzsaw, posted 10-15-2010 10:51 PM Modulous has replied

  
Bolder-dash
Member (Idle past 3649 days)
Posts: 983
From: China
Joined: 11-14-2009


Message 154 of 296 (586838)
10-15-2010 3:59 AM
Reply to: Message 153 by Modulous
10-15-2010 3:42 AM


The thread is about trying to persuade me that Eternal Life is to be anticipated as something to look forward to. I agree it is unknowable - but is there any scenario at all which would be something to look forward to?
Well, I can think of one scenario if I can just take a stab at it. The one in which the afterlife would be something you enjoy beyond anything you have ever experienced before, and which there is no definition for on our earthly world.
That's just one of the scenarios I racked my brain with for weeks and weeks to come up with. Need another?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 153 by Modulous, posted 10-15-2010 3:42 AM Modulous has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 156 by Modulous, posted 10-15-2010 6:12 AM Bolder-dash has replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 303 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 155 of 296 (586845)
10-15-2010 4:41 AM
Reply to: Message 152 by Bolder-dash
10-15-2010 2:41 AM


Not to stray far off topic, but do you know, is there a place to nominate the stupidest post of the month on this forum?
So ... you can't answer his question?
Only you could have communicated your inability to answer his question more succintly by not posting anything.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 152 by Bolder-dash, posted 10-15-2010 2:41 AM Bolder-dash has not replied

  
Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 156 of 296 (586852)
10-15-2010 6:12 AM
Reply to: Message 154 by Bolder-dash
10-15-2010 3:59 AM


Well, I can think of one scenario if I can just take a stab at it. The one in which the afterlife would be something you enjoy beyond anything you have ever experienced before, and which there is no definition for on our earthly world.
That's just one of the scenarios I racked my brain with for weeks and weeks to come up with. Need another?
You said you read the whole thread. The OP raises this kind of afterlife and why I would not look forward to it and subsequent posts cover it. How about responding to those rather than asking me to repeat the points?
Edited by Modulous, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 154 by Bolder-dash, posted 10-15-2010 3:59 AM Bolder-dash has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 158 by Bolder-dash, posted 10-15-2010 8:35 PM Modulous has replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3983
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.0


Message 157 of 296 (586859)
10-15-2010 8:07 AM
Reply to: Message 152 by Bolder-dash
10-15-2010 2:41 AM


Stupidest post of the month
BD writes:
Not to stray far off topic, but do you know, is there a place to nominate the stupidest post of the month on this forum?
Sorry, no--you'll have to soldier on without any special notice.

Dost thou prate, rogue?
-Cassio
Real things always push back.
-William James

This message is a reply to:
 Message 152 by Bolder-dash, posted 10-15-2010 2:41 AM Bolder-dash has not replied

  
Bolder-dash
Member (Idle past 3649 days)
Posts: 983
From: China
Joined: 11-14-2009


Message 158 of 296 (586964)
10-15-2010 8:35 PM
Reply to: Message 156 by Modulous
10-15-2010 6:12 AM


I browsed through some of this thread...
You said you read the whole thread....
Did you accidentally respond to the wrong person? The reason I am assuming you are responding to the wrong person is because when someone says they read some of the thread they usually don't mean they read the whole thread (note the positioning of the word "some" in my text as opposed to the positioning of the word "whole" in your text for more clues), so when you said to me that I said I read the whole thread you surely either were referring to someone else or else you are not very precise with the English language.
But if you were referring to me when you said that I said I read the whole thread, when I said I read some of the thread (I hope you don't mind me borrowing your tone of indignation for just a moment):
There happens to be a pretty good reason why I didn't find it necessary to read the entire thread . Because when someone is going to start speculating that they are not so sure that they would enjoy the afterlife, because they might find or boring, or because they might be different at the age of 18 then they are at 28, and any other earthbound consideration for how they will feel about living in a non-earthbound world is in itself already such an inexplicably ridiculous philosophical stance to take, that there is virtually no text that could support the idea that what you are experiencing here on earth will make you capable of deciding the level of satisfaction you would have in a completely different universe or state of being.
Its about akin to a 2 year old baby saying, you know I think kissing girls would be so so yucky, I would never ever ever want to do that. Only even more of an uninformed opinion because at least a 2 year old can see what woman look like.
There is nothing you can say, there is nothing you would ever be able to say that would validate your conclusion that you don't believe that an afterlife is something that would be suitable for you. The concept is that its an experience that awaits you after you die, that you can't know about yet, but that is a state of eternal bliss , eternal satisfaction, eternal peace. You are certainly free to say that you don't believe that such a place exists, but to suggest that you don't believe you would enjoy eternal peace even if it did exist is worse than a baby trying to understand sex, its worse than a squid trying to understand perestroika, its worse than sloths debating Carl Jung. You know nothing about it, and nothing about what you would be like at that time-you are totally incapable of forming an opinion about the level of satisfaction you would get from a state of being that you know zero about.
Nothing you or anyone else bound here on earth can possibly say would shed any light whatsoever on whether or not a entirely different state of being that is undefinable here on earth would be any fun for you particularly or not. You can't think of it in terms of what you know right now. You either believe that its eternally good or you don't, you can't go analyzing about well just how good is it.
Whether or not you believe in a devil or not is one issue. But to say that you might believe in the concept of a devil or just pure evil, but even so, you feel that maybe evil wouldn't be so bad, and you actually might kind of like a devil character and just feel he is misunderstand and maybe he would be kind of amusing sometimes, plus I like the color red, and you know, I used to play with fire a lot when I was a kid, and those horns, they make me laugh.....would be a pretty stupid thing to say given the level of your present knowledge of the devil (which is very close to zero), wouldn't you agree?
Where is that skillet, I need to whack myself in the head again, this is such a long dream.
Edited by Bolder-dash, : No reason given.
Edited by Bolder-dash, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 156 by Modulous, posted 10-15-2010 6:12 AM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 159 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-15-2010 9:46 PM Bolder-dash has not replied
 Message 160 by Modulous, posted 10-15-2010 9:47 PM Bolder-dash has replied
 Message 161 by jar, posted 10-15-2010 10:00 PM Bolder-dash has not replied
 Message 166 by Omnivorous, posted 10-16-2010 12:35 AM Bolder-dash has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 303 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 159 of 296 (586968)
10-15-2010 9:46 PM
Reply to: Message 158 by Bolder-dash
10-15-2010 8:35 PM


Its about akin to a 2 year old baby saying, you know I think kissing girls would be so so yucky, I would never ever ever want to do that. Only even more of an uninformed opinion because at least a 2 year old can see what woman look like.
Apparently I agree with Bolder-dash about something.
I think the next sign of the coming apocalypse involves four horsemen.
Seriously, B-d, that was well put.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 158 by Bolder-dash, posted 10-15-2010 8:35 PM Bolder-dash has not replied

  
Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 160 of 296 (586969)
10-15-2010 9:47 PM
Reply to: Message 158 by Bolder-dash
10-15-2010 8:35 PM


Did you accidentally respond to the wrong person? The reason I am assuming you are responding to the wrong person is because when someone says they read some of the thread they usually don't mean they read the whole thread (note the positioning of the word "some" in my text as opposed to the positioning of the word "whole" in your text for more clues), so when you said to me that I said I read the whole thread you surely either were referring to someone else or else you are not very precise with the English language.
Yes, very good. I notice that you decided to ignore the actual criticism which was that the very first post in this thread addressed your response despite your confident attitude of dismissal which would imply you understood it.
There is nothing you can say, there is nothing you would ever be able to say that would validate your conclusion that you don't believe that an afterlife is something that would be suitable for you.
Very well, if that is the case your God joins the rest of the Gods in this thread which have failed to bring a persuasive case for eternal life. I will continue to not look forward to it.
The concept is that its an experience that awaits you after you die, that you can't know about yet, but that is a state of eternal bliss , eternal satisfaction, eternal peace. You are certainly free to say that you don't believe that such a place exists, but to suggest that you don't believe you would enjoy eternal peace even if it did exist is worse than a baby trying to understand sex, its worse than a squid trying to understand perestroika, its worse than sloths debating Carl Jung.
I never for one moment said I wouldn't enjoy it. Indeed in Message 5 I said
quote:
I'd have no choice but to be happy and fulfilled... It is certainly no life I'd choose to lead
So if you're going to try and persuade me that it is a life I should choose to lead, you can't just describe the life - I have already indicated I'm aware of the scenario and that it doesn't appeal to me: I find no meaning or purpose in an eternal state of bliss.
Its about akin to a 2 year old baby saying, you know I think kissing girls would be so so yucky, I would never ever ever want to do that. Only even more of an uninformed opinion because at least a 2 year old can see what woman look like.
The same applies to your assertion about how great it would all be. I am perfectly content to be wrong in this issue, and maybe when I'm 56 I will have a different view. My point is, that in my current state of mind, I don't find eternal life such a great prospect (either I don't care or don't want it). It is nowhere near as great a temptation to me as it is trumpeted by theists of various persuasions as if it was a self-evident truth.
As a thirty year old, I feel largely the same, though I haven't mulled on it for a while.
So we're both 2 year olds. You think kissing girls would be great, I ask why? Is that such a crazy question?
Where is that skillet, I need to whack myself in the head again, this is such a long dream.
Might I recommend pinching? The problem with skillets is if you have mistaken the waking world for the dreaming one you could end up impairing your brain function.
Edited by Modulous, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 158 by Bolder-dash, posted 10-15-2010 8:35 PM Bolder-dash has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 164 by Bolder-dash, posted 10-16-2010 12:00 AM Modulous has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 413 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 161 of 296 (586971)
10-15-2010 10:00 PM
Reply to: Message 158 by Bolder-dash
10-15-2010 8:35 PM


The concept is that its an experience that awaits you after you die, that you can't know about yet, but that is a state of eternal bliss , eternal satisfaction, eternal peace.
Speaking as a Christian, that sure sounds like hell.
I cannot imagine any sane person that would put up with that for any extended period, much less eternity. Of course what you describe could be some drug induced coma or maybe the result of some advanced hallucinogen and imposed by force by some truly evil critter but certainly not something that a sane individual might choose.
I perhaps could imagine some eternity where you get to struggle, face increasingly difficult challenges, with failures and successes, always challenged, made to question, filled with doubt and uncertainty; but even there I would hope there would be extended periods of unconsciousness.
The idea of eternal bliss, eternal satisfaction, eternal peace may be great for preteens dreaming of their first love, but not something anyone post adolescent would enjoy.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 158 by Bolder-dash, posted 10-15-2010 8:35 PM Bolder-dash has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 179 by Phat, posted 10-16-2010 11:43 AM jar has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 162 of 296 (586973)
10-15-2010 10:51 PM
Reply to: Message 153 by Modulous
10-15-2010 3:42 AM


Eternal Life In The Biblical Heaven Good; Biblical Alternative Bad
Modulous writes:
The thread is about trying to persuade me that Eternal Life is to be anticipated as something to look forward to. I agree it is unknowable - but is there any scenario at all which would be something to look forward to?
All that scripture says about Heaven makes earth life look shabby in comparison, and the Lake of Fire absolutely horrible beyond immagination.
Jesus said, in John 14:2,3 (ASV)
Let not your heart be troubled: believe in God, believe also in me. 2In my Father's house are many mansions; if it were not so, I would have told you; for I go to prepare a place for you. 3And if I go and prepare a place for you, I come again, and will receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also. 4And whither I go, ye know the way. 5Thomas saith unto him, Lord, we know not whither thou goest; how know we the way? 6Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, and the truth, and the life: no one cometh unto the Father, but by me.
Revelation 21: 17-27
And he measured the wall thereof, a hundred and forty and four cubits, according to the measure of a man, that is, of an angel. 18And the building of the wall thereof was jasper: and the city was pure gold, like unto pure glass. 19The foundations of the wall of the city were adorned with all manner of precious stones. The first foundation was jasper; the second, sapphire; the third, chalcedony; the fourth, emerald; 20the fifth, sardonyx; the sixth, sardius; the seventh, chrysolite; the eighth, beryl; the ninth, topaz; the tenth, chrysoprase; the eleventh, jacinth; the twelfth, amethyst. 21And the twelve gates were twelve pearls; each one of the several gates was of one pearl: and the street of the city was pure gold, as it were transparent glass.
22And I saw no temple therein: for the Lord God the Almighty, and the Lamb, are the temple thereof. 23And the city hath no need of the sun, neither of the moon, to shine upon it: for the glory of God did lighten it, and the lamp thereof is the Lamb. 24And the nations shall walk amidst the light thereof: and the kings of the earth bring their glory into it. 25And the gates thereof shall in no wise be shut by day (for there shall be no night there): 26and they shall bring the glory and the honor of the nations into it: 27and there shall in no wise enter into it anything unclean, or he that maketh an abomination and a lie: but only they that are written in the Lamb's book of life.
King Solomon was, in Biblical terms, a type/analogous of the christ/messian, Jesus in that he had 700 wives. This is typical in that the conglomerate of true believers are referred to as the bride of Jesus, the christ/messiah. When he returns to raise the dead, his angels will gather all of the saved, first the dead and then the alive ones up to be with him for what is referred to as the marriage supper of the lamb. After this event and the rewarding of the resurrected Christians in Heaven etc he will return to the earth to rule a millennium
Then after the 1000 year millennial period this earth is destroyed by fire and a new heaven and is replaced by a new earth, new heavens and a new Jerusalem described above.
The saints/saved Christians will have rule with him in his kingdom. On one occasion he alluded to them ruling over cities of the kingdom. In this new world where this new glorious new Jerusalem is there will be kingdoms as is stated above. This is an eternal earth, city and kingdom where Christians will live and reign forever with Jesus.
Revelation 22:1-5
And he showed me a river of water of life, bright as crystal, proceeding out of the throne of God and of the Lamb, 2in the midst of the street thereof. And on this side of the river and on that was the tree of life, bearing twelve manner of fruits, yielding its fruit every month: and the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations. 3And there shall be no curse any more: and the throne of God and of the Lamb shall be therein: and his servants shall serve him; 4and they shall see his face; and his name'shall be on their foreheads. 5And there shall be night no more; and they need no light of lamp, neither light of sun; for the Lord God shall give them light: and they shall reign for ever and ever.
There will be no sickness or death and the devil and his angels, along with the unbelievers will absent; tormented in the Lake of Fire forever as other scriptures state.
One had better be absolutely sure that all of the prophecies cited, the Exodus evidence and other phemonena cited is all bogus before one should not fear the alternative to Heaven stated relative to unbelief and rejection of the gospel of Jesus.
I'm feel very badly and sorrowful for my unbelieving friends here at EvC and elsewhere. Why? Because I am absolutely convinced that the Biblical record is reliable from Genesis to Revelation, including all of the above. Jehovah of the Bible is one to be feared. Thus Solomon said, "The fear of Jehovah is the beginning of wisdom." and Jesus said in Luke 12:4,5, "And I say unto you my friends, Be not afraid of them that kill the body, and after that have no more that they can do. 5But I will warn you whom ye shall fear: Fear him, who after he hath killed hath power to cast into hell; yea, I say unto you, Fear him.
Modulous, I've stated the above and cited the scripture above to say that there is every reason to aspire to attain Heaven and no logical reason to subject one's self to the alternative who refuse it.
The catch is that one must believe that Jesus did indeed die for our sins and one must receive him as savior and submit to him as lord/master in order to get into Heaven. This is accountability to a lord/master. One must repent and turn from Biblically defined sins and live within those guidelines which Jesus and his apostles advocated.
If one detests NT guidelines, Jesus and Biblical Christians who live by NT fundamentals, i.e. Christian fundies and has no appreciation for the redemption Jesus afforded, likely one would not be comfortable with Jesus and folks who follow him in Heaven.
One must become changed via the new spiritual birth while here on earth and become compatible with the environs of the people and the christ/messiah up in the cosmos wherever Heaven is.
Edited by Buzsaw, : Spell fix

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 153 by Modulous, posted 10-15-2010 3:42 AM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 163 by Coyote, posted 10-15-2010 11:05 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 170 by Modulous, posted 10-16-2010 8:13 AM Buzsaw has replied

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 2125 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 163 of 296 (586974)
10-15-2010 11:05 PM
Reply to: Message 162 by Buzsaw
10-15-2010 10:51 PM


Eternal Life...
The promise of an afterlife is the biggest blank check ever written, and it is written by shamans of all stripes.
They sell what people desperately want for a promise to be kept later.
And because people desperately want what they are selling they can get away with anything.
And to seal the deal, shamans have made up the "or else" of hell.
Too bad the truth in lending and consumer protection laws don't apply. There would be a lot fewer shamans running the streets looking for their next victims.

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 162 by Buzsaw, posted 10-15-2010 10:51 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Bolder-dash
Member (Idle past 3649 days)
Posts: 983
From: China
Joined: 11-14-2009


Message 164 of 296 (586978)
10-16-2010 12:00 AM
Reply to: Message 160 by Modulous
10-15-2010 9:47 PM


Well, I would never really try to convince someone else about what their own personal beliefs should be, but let's suppose for a moment that in this afterlife is everyone you have ever known waiting there for you. Your family, people who have helped you in life, people who you have impacted positively without even realizing it, friends from your childhood. And along with these people are also all the secrets and mysteries of the world. Who built Stonehenge and why. Who killed John F. Kennedy. How did the Big Bang happen. Did that girl in your eighth grade science class really have a crush on you but was too shy to say so. Everything you ever wanted to find out you can know. Every memory that slowly faded from your blissful childhood can be retrieved and felt again. All the anger and regrets and mistakes you made you can wash away. You can chat with Einstein, and understand every math problem there is. You could hug your father who was sick and who you never made reconciliation with. You could go backwards and forwards in time. You could send your mind to anytime in history, and witness any event you choose. And better still, the next level of consciousness is just one step up an even higher rung of being. In the next level you have constant energy, you have alertness and brilliance of mind at will, while still maintaining your own unique imagination.
Or you can say that you will prefer to just disappear into a black void of nothingness. Never find the answers to anything, and never see all your loved ones ever again. Are you really equipped in this world right now to make that choice?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 160 by Modulous, posted 10-15-2010 9:47 PM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 165 by hooah212002, posted 10-16-2010 12:31 AM Bolder-dash has replied
 Message 169 by Modulous, posted 10-16-2010 7:51 AM Bolder-dash has not replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 820 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 165 of 296 (586979)
10-16-2010 12:31 AM
Reply to: Message 164 by Bolder-dash
10-16-2010 12:00 AM


My dad is a muslim and my brother is a hindu/buddhist (odd mix, I know): will they be there? Oh, and my kids are atheists, will they be there?

"What can be asserted without proof, can be dismissed without proof."-Hitch.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 164 by Bolder-dash, posted 10-16-2010 12:00 AM Bolder-dash has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 167 by Bolder-dash, posted 10-16-2010 12:48 AM hooah212002 has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024