Biological Evidence Against Intelligent Design

And there's always the possibility that there is an invisible pink unicorn hiding in your ass which is the source of all gravity in the universe..It's "possible".Do you have any REASON or EVIDENCE or MECHANISM or even SUGGESTION that leads you to the conclusion that "maybe something was designed but we haven't found it yet"?How is that argument any better than: "Maybe it was all designed to look like it wasn't designed?" Follow the logic in your criteria.There are two sets.
Set A: Those things for which we have evidence (includes evolution through natural selection)
Set B: Those things for which there is no evidence (includes Intelligent Design)Set B _ALSO_ includes EVERY SINGLE THING THAT ANYONE ANYWHERE AT ANYTIME CAN MAKE UP ON THE FLY.So, you are claiming that because we haven't collected evidence from EVERY SINGLE SPECIES on the planet, it is possible that Set B could be happening at the same time as Set A.Why not take it a step further?Since we haven't collected evidence from any single ORGANISM which is currently, was previously or will potentially be alive, we can't say definitively that Set B isn't occurring.And, since we can't determine which of (infinite randomly combined words) is "true" they must ALL be EQUALLY valid.So, on the one hand we have evolution, tried, true, tested and the basis of biology. The cornerstone of science for the last 150 years. A fact so rock solid that if it were disproven we'd have the throw out literally _ALL_ of science entirely.And, on the other hand, we have EVERYTHING ANYONE COULD EVER SAY.ID is as likely to be true as "Burp Rocket Cow Meteor".Can't disprove "Burp Rocket Cow Meteor" because you haven't collected evidence from EVERYTHING EVERYWHERE across all of time past present and future.Let's teach Burp Rocket Cow Meteor in school! YAY!

Do you believe that lightning is magic? I doubt it.
Was there a time when religious people would have made the same argument you are making here about lightning?Do you believe that rainbows are magic? I doubt it.
Was there a time when religious people would have made the same argument you are making here about rainbows?Do you believe that volcanoes are magic? I doubt it.
Was there a time when religious people would have made the same argument you are making here about volcanoes.I think you see where this list is going. So, let's flip the script.Is there ANYTHING in the ENTIRE HISTORY of the world which has been prove to actually be caused exclusively by "magic"?How about is there ANYTHING in the ENTIRE HISTORY of the world which was previously best explained by science which is not BETTER explained by "magic"?

So, since you haven't studied neurobiology, you assume that that entire field of medicine is actually a snippet from philosophy?AND, you think it's more rational to assume that magical elf wizards create brains in a magic brain factor then use inviso-rays to teleport them into heads.That's your "concept" of _BEST_ explanation for something?You shouldn't be allow to even use a computer, let alone post to the forums.

If I put a bullet in your brain, how does your mind fare?There is no "mind" without the brain.