Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,749 Year: 4,006/9,624 Month: 877/974 Week: 204/286 Day: 11/109 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Biological Evidence Against Intelligent Design
Damouse
Member (Idle past 4931 days)
Posts: 215
From: Brookfield, Wisconsin
Joined: 12-18-2005


Message 263 of 264 (587478)
10-19-2010 2:05 AM
Reply to: Message 256 by mosassam
10-17-2010 3:51 PM


Re: evidence against ID requires limits set on the designer
quote:
Re: evidence against ID requires limits set on the designer
The existence of the human mind is probably best explained by "magic" as science can only accept it with the pithy assumption 'cogito ergo sum'.
What a silly and conceited little statement. Unless you know the "science" behind the mind, you cant speak to this.
And as you've been informed, Descartes' comment is purely philosophical. Science has come a loooong way since then. What we know now, which is nowhere NEAR a complete understanding, would have blown Descartes' mind. Not that his argument wouldnt still have grounds, but still.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 256 by mosassam, posted 10-17-2010 3:51 PM mosassam has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024