Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,871 Year: 4,128/9,624 Month: 999/974 Week: 326/286 Day: 47/40 Hour: 1/1


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Intelligent Design ⇒

Intelligent Design vs. Real Science

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Intelligent Design vs. Real Science
nwr
Member
Posts: 6412
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 4.5

Normal Thread Display
Message 14 of 142 (588901)
10-28-2010 10:41 PM 		Reply to: Message 11 by Reveal
10-28-2010 9:50 PM

Re: So were here by chance? accident?
shadow71 writes:
...the odds against DNA assembling by chance are10^40:1
[according to Fred Hoyle, Evolution from Space,1981].
You chose a good day on which to post that. Larry Moran has just shown how silly it is, on a post to his blog:
Sandwalk: God Plays Bridge
​
Jesus was a liberal hippie
This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Reveal, posted 10-28-2010 9:50 PM Reveal has not replied
  
nwr
Member
Posts: 6412
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 4.5

Normal Thread Display
Message 37 of 142 (589311)
11-01-2010 2:58 PM 		Reply to: Message 28 by Buzsaw
10-29-2010 8:49 PM

Re: When ID Becomes Scientific
If I had my druthers, science classes should have the freedom to apply all of the evidence supportive to ID
I don't have a problem with that. You should be able to fit all of that evidence on one blank sheet of paper - and the paper would still be blank after adding all of the evidence.
​
Jesus was a liberal hippie
This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by Buzsaw, posted 10-29-2010 8:49 PM Buzsaw has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024