I noticed you didnt deny that he started with a conclusion, something you fellas proclaim is bass ackwards. So if your DADDY started with a conclusion are we justified in doing the same?
well no our "daddy", went arround the world and collected samples of animals and some fossils too. When he started to examine the stuff he braught home he found that some of the fossil bones of extinct species where related to living species in america, and his notes abbout birds that where simmilar and yet diferent depending on where they where he speculated that one species changes in to a nother. And after a lot more work he proposed natural selection evolution and so one...
he did not say out of the blue evolution made us he actualy did some work contraery to the IDists and creationists.
ID can be falsified, simply by demonstrating that order and law do not eixst, including purpose
It is a big jump form order to desighn so what you are saying that order hasto come from a divine one and that is the reason that my coin falls on heads 50% of the time and on tails 50% of the time.
and a2+b2=c2 tells you that god is responsible
purpose??? ok what is our purpose, where did you find out abbout our purpose
and what about chaos is that something your god did not yet put to order ???
ID predicts that law and order is recognizable and continues in great detail, in minute detail, in specific detail
It also predicts this behavior will continue, if taken outside of the womb and placed in a test tube, for example
It predicts that this process will continue even if it is proclaimed to not be design.
and this proves desighn how?? why do you need a god to make it so you are saying that it is impossible for nature do do it on its own whitout a fingersnap from god??
One would need to forumulate an assumption that these things do not exist for the assumption to have any meaning
I wanted to address your question before getting back to the topic in my other responses
i was thinking more abbout the asumption of there being a god would all the stuff you say that prove him still be the same if one left out a divine creator. Well we do not know and trying to prove something whit something you do not know is kinda tough. So on the one hand you have natural laws spawning from nature and you can see that every day, and on the other you have a creator whom you never see. Both explenations explain the current status one asumes there is no invisible undetectible shugar daddy and one assumes there is one. Im going whit the one that says there is no shuggar daddy cause he failed to show up well ever. If he does show up or if he does one of those behind the scens miracles one that science cannot explain well then i might give him a nother thought.