A scientific theory is, primarily, a description of the method rather than a description of the world. This ought to be obvious, since the purpose of the theory is to communicate the science.
I'm sorry but this bears no relationship to the scientific agenda.
Have you ever actually spoken to a scientist? Just curious.
If scientific theories were descriptions of methods instead of descriptions of the world, they wouldn't be able to make accurate predictions about the world - just about methods. And the purpose of science is to explain the world, not to explain itself. That kind of circular focus would produce no knowledge at all, how could it?
Once again you're up against the dilemma straggler keeps raising and you keep ignoring - your model of science makes it impossible for science to actually do what science observably does; thus you're wrong. Obviously.