|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 4835 days) Posts: 400 From: Colorado, USA Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: When does killing an animal constitute murder? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 92 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
If you kill a human to eat them does that stop it being murder?
Whilst I am not exactly disagreeing with you (yet) I want to know why killing animals for food is not murder but killing humans for the same reason is?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 92 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
I think we humans pretend to ourselves that our morality is based on sentience when in fact if you look more closely we just don't apply this consistently.
For example a fully developed chimp is almost certainly more sentient than a newborn human baby. But if forced to choose which one to kill what choice would most people make? OK, I hear you say, but a newborn human child has the capacity for greater sentience than the chimp in the future. So then I would ask about a geriatric human with a degenerative and irreversible brain disorder of some kind. Would they count as more sentient than a fully functioning chimp? What about a brain dead human being? When you consider that we not only kill sentient animals but experiment on them and cull them to near extinction the idea that our morality is consistently based on sentience in some way looks rather weak. Most of us would never treat even the least sentient human being in ways that we barely think twice about treating the most sentient of animals. Our morality is human-centric. Not rationally based on a criteria such as sentience. Personally I don't particularly have a problem with humans having human-centric morality - Effectively special pleading our own species as worthy of more moral consideration regardless of any more objective criteria (e.g. sentience). But I think we should recognise this rather than try to convince ourselves that our moral choices are based on objective criteria like sentience rather than specieistic and more emotional considerations. Edited by Straggler, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 92 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
Frako writes: There was a law for stranded sailors that they could kill and eat a shipmate selected by lottery if their own survival was dependent on that act. And troought history this law was used quite a few times by sailors. So you only consider it moral to eat animals if one's life depends on it? I am trying to find whether your moral line is the same for humans as animals and if it isn't on what basis you make a distinction.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 92 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
Jar writes: Morality has nothing to do with the question that I can see. I think it does and so does the author of the OP. From the OP:
quote: jar writes: Killing an animal is a crime when a particular society deems it a crime. And a particular society deems such things as crimes or not based on the moral outlook of that society. Edited by Straggler, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 92 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
From the OP (I quote) "Just to emphasize an important point: The topic of this thread is really about personal morality, not the legal definition of murder. I'm more interested in your own thoughts on the matter than what the law says."
jar writes: I do not see how there can be any substantive answer beyond that. If you don't have a personal morality view on this issue beyond what the law states then I don't see why you are contributing to this topic? But I will ask (given that humans are animals) why don't you kill other humans? Simply because it is illegal to do so?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 92 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
You started off by defining use for food as the defining difference between murder and non-murder. Then when asked about eating humans you said that if you had to eat a human to stay alive it wouldn't constitute as murder. Fine.
But you obviously have different criteria of what constitutes "murder" depending on the species as you don't consider eating animals whether vital to survival or not as murder. So with regard to the question being asked in the OP - Is it just humans that get this different treatment? Or do you have a sort of sliding scale of moral preference and level of starvation required depending on some criteria?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 92 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
jar writes: So far I have not yet had sufficient reason to kill a human. I'm working on it.......... Have you ever had sufficient reason to kill any living creature?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 92 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
Frako writes: We humans kill other humans all the time and not for so different reasons then animals kill the same typ of animals. So? Does the fact that we do things, and even the argument that is natural to do so, make it morally acceptable to do those things? One could argue that rape is natural. But is it immoral?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 92 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
And would your "sufficient reason" depend at all on what species of creature you were engaged in killing?
A maggot Vs a human for example.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 92 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
Straggler writes: And would your "sufficient reason" depend at all on what species of creature you were engaged in killing? A maggot Vs a human for example. jar writes: I don't know. Sorry. You have no more idea whether the reason you might kill an insect (for example) is "sufficient reason" to kill a human being? Who hasn't swatted an annoying bug? Then I shall restrict myself to annoying you from afar and well out of range of your (apparently) psycopathic tendencies.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 92 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
Frako writes: Well there is a sliding scale, humans are on top and only in some special casses killing a noter human is not murder. Whilst I agree - Why do you think humans are at the top of the scale?
Frako writes: Then come the animals that have a social taboo on eating them, after that come the animals that we usualy eat. What animals do you consider to be taboo?
Frako writes: Why is there a difference, well i am not sure social norms and all the oteher crap that shapes our decisions. Sure. So if I offered you some chimp meat would you have any moral problem with that at all?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 92 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
jar writes: There is simply no general rule. Nor have I said that there is a "general rule".
jar writes: Your post is a great example for support for my position. And your post is a great example of ignoring the implications of your own answers. You say that you have "quite often" had sufficient reason to kill other living creatures. Yet when I ask if the same "sufficient reason" applies to humans you say you "I don't know".
jar writes: I may have killed a maggot, but not that I can remember. To paraphrase: "I may have killed a human, but not that I can remember". You see how if we apply your same "sufficient reason" (i.e. uncaring disregard) to humans it sounds rather psychotic doesn't it?
jar writes: Sorry but I see nothing psychopathic in any of that. I don't think you are really a psychopath. I just don't believe you when you say that you "don't know" whether sufficent reason to kill a bug constitutes sufficient reason to kill a human.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 92 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
Frako writes: Pranists (i dunno how to spell it) from India, they walk around naked with a peacock feather in their hand sweaping the flore so they do not step on a bug accidently. And I think they are slightly "eccentric" in their behaviour. But at least they are trying to be morally consistent. Whatever that may or may not be worth.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 92 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
jar writes: Guess what, each case is separate and individual. What might be sufficient reason in one instance may not be sufficient reason in another. And how does this detract from the point that what you consider to be "sufficent reason" for killing a bug is very different from that which is considered "sufficent reason" for killing a human? When is uncaring disregard or mere annoyance "sufficent reason" for killing a human in the same way that you have implied about bugs?
Straggler writes: jar writes: To paraphrase: "I may have killed a human, but not that I can remember". Good thing I did not say that then isn't it. Yes because that would imply psychotic tendencies wouldn't it? It was you that said you "don't know" if your reasons for killing maggots were "sufficient reason" for killing humans. I would suggest that being the non-psychopath that we both agree you are, that your previous answer didn't very well reflect the true nature of your personal morality witrh regard to different forms of life. Which is what this thread is supposed to be about.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 92 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
Frako writes: I know my moral lines are very blurry tough there is a method to my madness i do not know what the method is tough there is one. Now that is just about the best description of personal morality I have heard on this topic. And one that I can personally identify with. Having eaten dog in Vietnam and bush meats in Africa (quite possibly ape of some sort) I am no position to take any moral high ground. But to pretend that we are not applying personal morality of some confused kind with regard to this topic is just dishonest.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024