|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 61 (9209 total) |
| |
The Rutificador chile | |
Total: 919,507 Year: 6,764/9,624 Month: 104/238 Week: 21/83 Day: 4/0 Hour: 0/1 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Can a valid, supportable reason be offered for deconversion | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
subbie Member (Idle past 1513 days) Posts: 3509 Joined: |
Sorry, I'm much more interested in an examination of your misuse of the English language, and the many egregious errors you make in every post.
How about a discussion examining (some of) the alledged reasons for deconversion Alleged, not "alledged."Put a period at the end of sentences, or, if the sentence happens to be a question, a question mark. An exploration into the individual justifications concerning these reasons. Not a sentence, or as my English teachers used to put on my papers to save time, "NAS."
Against a Biblical perspective NAS
This may not fly with Percy, I know not Punctuation. Well, let's review. In four sentences you made five errors. Not a very good average, eh Abbot? Oh, and just to stay on topic, I do not believe in any deities because there's no evidence of any, just as there's no evidence that you can write coherently. I can't wait for your next post in this thread. Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate ...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blue Jay Member (Idle past 2956 days) Posts: 2843 From: You couldn't pronounce it with your mouthparts Joined:
|
Hi, Dawn.
What would count as a "valid" reason? For instance, my religious leaders generally disapprove of leaving church because of a personal issue with some prominent member of the local congregation. I would argue that this is an invalid reason, because it's unrelated to religion, and decisions about religion should based on reasons related to religion. A valid reason would be something like, "I no longer believe what they teach"; or "I have never had a 'witness' from the Holy Ghost"; or something like that. These reasons are all valid, because they are direct counterpoints to the typical religious reasons why one would remain affiliated with a religion. What about "supportable"? Can we support the valid reasons I cited above?
"I no longer believe what they teach." Well, if I genuinely no longer believe what they teach, then I think this reason is supported. Of course, no one else will ever really know whether you're being honest about your belief, but that's not a valid reason to hold you up, so it shouldn't come in to this discussion.
"I have never had a 'witness' from the Holy Ghost." If true, then it is supported. Well, I suppose it's possible to be given a 'witness' and not recognize what it was, or to later doubt its authenticity. But, if you've had a witness, and were still not convinced, either God didn't provide a good enough of witness for you---which shouldn't have been a problem for Him if He actually knew you the way the scriptures claim---or the witness wasn't real. I argue that both of these constitute support for a decision to deconvert. If you disagree that these are good reasons for abandoning God, I guess I can't demonstrate that you're wrong. But, belief is always personal. I argue that the explanations for why these aren't good reasons are obscure and subjective, and thus, none of my business unless they're my explanations to myself. Edited by Bluejay, : space between "an" and "invalid" -Bluejay (a.k.a. Mantis, Thylacosmilus) Darwin loves you.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lyx2no Member (Idle past 4974 days) Posts: 1277 From: A vast, undifferentiated plane. Joined:
|
I call dibbs on arguments of authority. If you ever bother with your own topic, DB, you'll have to get my approval for all arguments of the form "Is not!"
By the authority invested in me under the dibbs rule, use of the argument "Becaaaa*use!" by apostates shall herein be ruled valid and supportable. *Shakespeare multiple vowel rule. Tofu cars taste even better than regular cars World's first green truth.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
xongsmith Member Posts: 2620 From: massachusetts US Joined: |
Dwise1 writes: The plain fact is that except for that very stern don't do it!, the Bible really doesn't have anything to say about deconversion. There is that story of the new convert who was ready to join up with the Apostles & Jesus, but first wanted to take some time to bury his father. Jesus tells him to come along right now, and forget about his dad, saying something to the effect of "Let the dead bury the dead." This shows up at the end of the Gregory Peck masterpiece "To Kill A Mockingbird" when the sheriff utters that exact line. It also shows up in Dylan's "It's All Over Now, Baby Blue" with the last verse line "Forget the dead you've left, they will not follow you." In context with the other famous Jesus line about returning with a Sword, we find that Jesus wasn't much the peace hippy dude as we might have liked. He not all that he was cracked up to be. Had a lot of cool things to say, but in the end comes off as a pretty deluded insane wacko.
Dawn, I suspect that you imagine that deconversion always results in atheism. I submit that it does not always, but rather it often results in another more functional (or at least less dysfunctional) form of the same religion. You can deconvert from Atheism, too. For example, RAZD has done that. I might suspect, that in his case, it was some kind of a Eureka!-like synthesis of the marvelousness of the entire universe, not a deluded Intelligent Design Institute view, but an even simpler snap of the fingers. However, RAZD has abundantly made it clear that it is a private matter and not up for display here. So we can only speculate. - xongsmith, 5.7d
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
arachnophilia Member (Idle past 1602 days) Posts: 9069 From: god's waiting room Joined: |
jar writes: If the god being marketed seems stupid, cruel, or just plain silly then of course that god should b thrown away. why? lots of people are stupid, cruel, and silly, yet they still exist. an evil or inept god is still a god, right?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ZenMonkey Member (Idle past 4768 days) Posts: 428 From: Portland, OR USA Joined: |
I have two reasons.
There is no compelling evidence that the God of the Bible exists. If the God of the Bible does exist, He's evil.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
arachnophilia Member (Idle past 1602 days) Posts: 9069 From: god's waiting room Joined: |
hi again Dawn,
Dawn Bertot writes: Against a Biblical perspective as i mentioned in the previous thread, there are actually quite a few perspective on the bible, and a good solid academic understanding of the actual contents of the text can frequently lead to atheism. many of the "recovering christians" i have know cited the bible among their reasons. but, i'd like to shift this away from the bible you know and love, and discuss a book you likely know very little about.
quote: this is the famous "test" from the book of mormon. it provides a pretty clear scriptural reason for de-conversion, and encourages a kind of (perhaps false) skepticism about the text. now, i really like talking to the LDS missionaries, and find the LDS people perhaps some of the kindest, most caring followers-of-christ i have ever known. but they always seem to disappear when i quote this verse to them, and tell them that their book has failed the test for me. now, i can get into a lot of the issues that i find suspect about the book of mormon -- but i'd really be more interested to know why you don't accept the other testament of jesus christ.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 97 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Because I am not stupid, cruel or just plain silly.
A stupid, cruel or just plain silly god may still be a god but not something worth worshiping. Just throw the sucker away. Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
arachnophilia Member (Idle past 1602 days) Posts: 9069 From: god's waiting room Joined: |
jar writes: Because I am not stupid, cruel or just plain silly. A stupid, cruel or just plain silly god may still be a god but not something worth worshiping. Just throw the sucker away. even if the cruel god will punish you for not worshiping him or her?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 97 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Of course.
Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 670 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
arachnophilia writes:
Sounds like a good reason to shoot back. even if the cruel god will punish you for not worshiping him or her? "I'm Rory Bellows, I tell you! And I got a lot of corroborating evidence... over here... by the throttle!"
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
arachnophilia Member (Idle past 1602 days) Posts: 9069 From: god's waiting room Joined: |
ringo writes: Sounds like a good reason to shoot back. that would be a losing battle, almost by definition. i do, however, appreciate the old testament idea of struggling with god. i think it's a much more realistic and mature religious philosophy.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
onifre Member (Idle past 3209 days) Posts: 4854 From: Dark Side of the Moon Joined: |
lots of people are stupid, cruel, and silly, yet they still exist. an evil or inept god is still a god, right? Wouldn't the confirmed existence of one god be ample proof to suggest that there can be many gods? And if so, why settle for the cruel, stupid and silly one? Look at what happened to the US during the Bush admin. I think it would be best not to settle. If you meet the asshole god, maybe try finding the cool god and ignore the other one. - Oni
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
frako Member Posts: 2932 From: slovenija Joined: |
that would be a losing battle, almost by definition. i do, however, appreciate the old testament idea of struggling with god. i think it's a much more realistic and mature religious philosophy. Nah If he is as stupid as his creation looks like. I use the same method like someone used in a legend against a dragon he asked him if he is all that powerful then he should eat himself. When he tries to give you a trial you swipe a sword from an angel and stab him in the forehead. When he sends me to hell i challenge Satan for the ruler ship of hell win and then lead an all out attack on heaven. (it is better to rule in hell then to serve in heaven) lol Lol tough there is no need to kill god like there is no need to kill the pink unicorn they both do not exists.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
purpledawn Member (Idle past 3715 days) Posts: 4453 From: Indiana Joined: |
quote:People tend to leave a club when it no longer serves a purpose in their lives.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024