Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,468 Year: 3,725/9,624 Month: 596/974 Week: 209/276 Day: 49/34 Hour: 0/5


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Mt. St. Helens
Coyote
Member (Idle past 2128 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 6 of 16 (595992)
12-12-2010 12:12 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by faith24
12-11-2010 11:42 PM


Mt. St. Helens is a piker
Rock layers can be dated, and their depositional history can be determined. This can be done using a number of different techniques which complement one another.
Mt. St. Helens deposited a lot of material, but the material in the river beds is not rock. Rock takes a long time to form. What St. Helens deposited in the lower valleys is still more akin to mud -- sediments. It washes downhill very easily and accumulates in the valleys. This is very different from the lava flows that you see from various volcanoes.
Erosion can cut through mud very quickly, but that says nothing about the rate of erosion in rock layers. That takes a long time, depending on a wide variety of factors.
For creationists to try to equate the two, mud vs. rock (St. Helens vs. the Grand Canyon), is neither accurate nor honest.
Why can't you folks just stick to the facts?

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by faith24, posted 12-11-2010 11:42 PM faith24 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by faith24, posted 12-12-2010 3:05 AM Coyote has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024