Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9176 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: sirs
Post Volume: Total: 917,656 Year: 4,913/9,624 Month: 261/427 Week: 7/64 Day: 3/2 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Can a valid, supportable reason be offered for deconversion
Dawn Bertot
Member (Idle past 172 days)
Posts: 3571
Joined: 11-23-2007


Message 106 of 566 (596289)
12-14-2010 9:08 AM
Reply to: Message 99 by bluescat48
12-13-2010 11:33 PM


Oh, really? Talking snakes?
Yeah I know what you mean. How could anyone in the 1700s believe that little people could appear and talk on a 19 inch box. I guess its just whos behind the actions and for what reason, right?
Talking snake, talking donkey, yeah I can see it, if there is a good enough reason and mind to bring it about. What say ye?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 99 by bluescat48, posted 12-13-2010 11:33 PM bluescat48 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 127 by bluescat48, posted 12-14-2010 12:55 PM Dawn Bertot has not replied

  
Dawn Bertot
Member (Idle past 172 days)
Posts: 3571
Joined: 11-23-2007


Message 107 of 566 (596290)
12-14-2010 9:16 AM
Reply to: Message 93 by jar
12-13-2010 9:25 PM


Re: scriptural unity
So you claim, but which would still not indicate 'unity of purpose'. In addition you have offered no evidence that much of the Bible is messianic or that Jesus is in anyway related to any of the messianic passages.
Any of the Old Testament prophecies that are clear representations of and about Christ and point directly to his life and minisrty will suffice. Some are unmistakable that it cannot be missed except by someone trying to misapply them
And that says nothing about the inspiration that kept the word of God intact through the years
Our ability to reproduce nearly the entirity of the NT together from the early and late Church fathers, so we can see that the manuscripts match nearly without mistake the original autographs
Like I said, "I" dont need to do anything. The scriptures, Prophets, the Law and the NT piece it together so that even a simpleton such as mayself cannot missed it
Merry Christmas (Christ-mas) everybody
Dawn Bertot

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by jar, posted 12-13-2010 9:25 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 110 by Panda, posted 12-14-2010 9:30 AM Dawn Bertot has replied
 Message 121 by jar, posted 12-14-2010 10:22 AM Dawn Bertot has replied

  
Dawn Bertot
Member (Idle past 172 days)
Posts: 3571
Joined: 11-23-2007


Message 108 of 566 (596291)
12-14-2010 9:25 AM
Reply to: Message 94 by Dr Adequate
12-13-2010 9:30 PM


The fact that it was written by one person actually gives it the unity of thought and purpose which the Bible so singularly lacks.
You would think right. So tell me Mr, Im an expert on all the theological classics, what exacally is the theme of the Koran? Does it have a main theme to an utimate purpose or is it just a bunch of lifted stories packed together?
Dawn Bertot

This message is a reply to:
 Message 94 by Dr Adequate, posted 12-13-2010 9:30 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Dawn Bertot
Member (Idle past 172 days)
Posts: 3571
Joined: 11-23-2007


Message 109 of 566 (596293)
12-14-2010 9:29 AM
Reply to: Message 95 by ringo
12-13-2010 10:36 PM


The OP seems to ask for reasons why anybody would deconvert, not just you. I don't think you "should" deconvert. Frankly, I'm just glad you're not on my side.
Youve cut me, youve cut me deep and I thought we were friends. Right now and at this very point I am crying my eyes out because of your remarks. No, I just kidding, but you cut me man, it hurts man. No I just kidding again
So exacally what side are you on and where is it headed?
Dawn Bertot
Edited by Dawn Bertot, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by ringo, posted 12-13-2010 10:36 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 124 by ringo, posted 12-14-2010 11:44 AM Dawn Bertot has not replied
 Message 165 by xongsmith, posted 12-15-2010 12:53 AM Dawn Bertot has not replied

  
Panda
Member (Idle past 3801 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


Message 110 of 566 (596294)
12-14-2010 9:30 AM
Reply to: Message 107 by Dawn Bertot
12-14-2010 9:16 AM


Re: scriptural unity
Dawn Bertot writes:
Talking snake, talking donkey, yeah I can see it, if there is a good enough reason and mind to bring it about. What say ye?
Are you ever angry at your American schooling?
Do you feel that Mount Dora let you down?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 107 by Dawn Bertot, posted 12-14-2010 9:16 AM Dawn Bertot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 114 by Dawn Bertot, posted 12-14-2010 9:54 AM Panda has replied

  
Dawn Bertot
Member (Idle past 172 days)
Posts: 3571
Joined: 11-23-2007


Message 111 of 566 (596295)
12-14-2010 9:32 AM
Reply to: Message 100 by bluescat48
12-13-2010 11:36 PM


The Nazis, the KKK etc.
Abortion, Liberal agendas, etc, etc. Shall I go on. Tell me more of how "your" morality is better than the Nazi's
Dawn Bertot
Edited by Dawn Bertot, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 100 by bluescat48, posted 12-13-2010 11:36 PM bluescat48 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 125 by bluescat48, posted 12-14-2010 12:50 PM Dawn Bertot has not replied
 Message 132 by arachnophilia, posted 12-14-2010 5:20 PM Dawn Bertot has not replied

  
Dawn Bertot
Member (Idle past 172 days)
Posts: 3571
Joined: 11-23-2007


Message 112 of 566 (596297)
12-14-2010 9:36 AM
Reply to: Message 101 by xongsmith
12-14-2010 12:27 AM


SHHHHHHHH! Dawn is one of our best ever undercover plants for deconversion!!!!
And still as of yet, no one has provided even a specific valid reason why I or anyone else should leave or abandon Christianity
Alot of General complaints, but no argument that says, "You should abandon those beliefs because..................................
Maybe someone will set one out in logical form, so you fellas can get started
Dawn Bertot
Edited by Dawn Bertot, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 101 by xongsmith, posted 12-14-2010 12:27 AM xongsmith has seen this message but not replied

  
Dawn Bertot
Member (Idle past 172 days)
Posts: 3571
Joined: 11-23-2007


Message 113 of 566 (596302)
12-14-2010 9:44 AM
Reply to: Message 102 by dwise1
12-14-2010 1:00 AM


Re: Please learn how to read, Dawn
I have been involved in on-line debating and discussion since the mid-1980's. I also participated in local "amateur night"
Your killing me man. "Amaterur night", are you serious?
Again I will tell you, quit with your grammatical ramblings and present the argument or arguments that should motivate one to deconvert
"Mid 1980s." Your killing me man. Im holding my stomach, bent over laughing. Sorry it will be a minute to complete and send this post. Oni, needs to use that stuff, it priceless
Watchout ICANT, we got a guy here that has been debating since the mid 80s. Crap, thats funny
Dawn Bertot
Edited by Dawn Bertot, : No reason given.
Edited by Dawn Bertot, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 102 by dwise1, posted 12-14-2010 1:00 AM dwise1 has not replied

  
Dawn Bertot
Member (Idle past 172 days)
Posts: 3571
Joined: 11-23-2007


Message 114 of 566 (596306)
12-14-2010 9:54 AM
Reply to: Message 110 by Panda
12-14-2010 9:30 AM


Re: scriptural unity
Are you ever angry at your American schooling?
Do you feel that Mount Dora let you down?
Not at all Son. You wasting your time Son. I noticed that you Never have an actual argument, just snide remarks
Is that all youve got? The one about the talking Box, really got to you, didnt it?
Dawn Bertot
Edited by Dawn Bertot, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 110 by Panda, posted 12-14-2010 9:30 AM Panda has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 117 by Panda, posted 12-14-2010 10:14 AM Dawn Bertot has replied

  
Dawn Bertot
Member (Idle past 172 days)
Posts: 3571
Joined: 11-23-2007


Message 115 of 566 (596308)
12-14-2010 10:00 AM
Reply to: Message 102 by dwise1
12-14-2010 1:00 AM


Re: Please learn how to read, Dawn
The things to note about the vast majority of my postings is that I have information or ideas to get across and I write as clearly as I can to get them across to my audience.
And nothing to do with the topic at hand and no argument to present
So do you have a reason why I should deconvert? Can you set it out without a lecture?
Dawn Bertot

This message is a reply to:
 Message 102 by dwise1, posted 12-14-2010 1:00 AM dwise1 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 118 by dwise1, posted 12-14-2010 10:14 AM Dawn Bertot has replied

  
Dawn Bertot
Member (Idle past 172 days)
Posts: 3571
Joined: 11-23-2007


Message 116 of 566 (596309)
12-14-2010 10:07 AM
Reply to: Message 104 by dwise1
12-14-2010 1:27 AM


Dawn, if you had read my first posts here, you would see that I was trying to establish some definitions of terms, which is what I was taught in logic class was the first step of any debate or discussion.
Did they teach you how to write out a SIMPLE, argument or proposition, the likes of which is, 30 to 40 words or less, as to why I should decovert?
You write to hear yourself, not to make things simplier or help others. This is obvious by the length of your unncessary ramblings, with no point on topic. Just set IT out without the Sominex, lectures. Pleeeeeease?
Dawn Bertot
Edited by Dawn Bertot, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by dwise1, posted 12-14-2010 1:27 AM dwise1 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 120 by dwise1, posted 12-14-2010 10:20 AM Dawn Bertot has not replied

  
Panda
Member (Idle past 3801 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


Message 117 of 566 (596310)
12-14-2010 10:14 AM
Reply to: Message 114 by Dawn Bertot
12-14-2010 9:54 AM


Re: scriptural unity
DB writes:
Your killing me man. "Amaterur night", are you serious?
Again I will tell you, quit with your grammatical ramblings and present the argument or arguments that should motivate one to deconvert
"Mid 1980s." Your killing me man. Im holding my stomach, bent over laughing. Sorry it will be a minute to complete and send this post. Oni, needs to use that stuff, it priceless
Watchout ICANT, we got a guy here that has been debating since the mid 80s. Crap, thats funny
Your claim to be religiously educated (Dawn: "Im an expert on all the theological classics") is completely undermined by the fact that English is your first language and yet you can barely read or write.
(You even mispelt 'amateur' when it was spelt correctly in what you were quoting.)
Why do you think you can understand "all the theological classics" when you cannot read or write to a level above first school?
Nothing you post has any worth as what goes into your head and what comes out again is completely corrupted by your lack of English comprehension skills.
Many old people, who can't read, go to college to learn.
You would not be embarrasing yourself to sign up for remedial reading courses.
But you are embarrassing yourself by posting such half-baked nonsense.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 114 by Dawn Bertot, posted 12-14-2010 9:54 AM Dawn Bertot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 128 by Dawn Bertot, posted 12-14-2010 4:58 PM Panda has not replied

  
dwise1
Member
Posts: 5974
Joined: 05-02-2006
Member Rating: 3.6


Message 118 of 566 (596311)
12-14-2010 10:14 AM
Reply to: Message 115 by Dawn Bertot
12-14-2010 10:00 AM


Re: Please learn how to read, Dawn
So do you have a reason why I should deconvert?
Stop changing the subject! None of the deconversion discussion here nor in the other topic has ever been about you personally deconverting. Where the hell did you ever get that crazy idea?
Oh yeah, you guessed it into existence. Rather than actually read what was written, you created your own imaginary version, detached from reality.
For once in your life, get a clue! Then you might stop to be treated like the idiot that you keep presenting to us.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 115 by Dawn Bertot, posted 12-14-2010 10:00 AM Dawn Bertot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 122 by Panda, posted 12-14-2010 10:22 AM dwise1 has replied
 Message 130 by Dawn Bertot, posted 12-14-2010 5:09 PM dwise1 has replied

  
frako
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 2932
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


Message 119 of 566 (596312)
12-14-2010 10:17 AM
Reply to: Message 98 by Dawn Bertot
12-13-2010 11:26 PM


If you look deeper in scripture for more than physical reactions and reason, Paul explains that all spiritual blessings were met in Jesus Christ
Ah spiritual blessings, im sorry i did not know that they where the same blessings as the milk carton can give you yes that is a very good reason to believe in your god and not the milk carton.
While there are always physical blessings as a result of following his principles, the main thrust was the reunification of man to God
Oh can you show me some of those physical blessings? What are they cured amputations, plants miraculously riping every day to provide enough to feed the world 2ce times over??
There are also negative physical results of following Christs rules and principles, as he indicated there would be
As there are negative physical results to the milk carton as it was said there would be, trees dying to make the carton and weather changes because of the over lumbering.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 98 by Dawn Bertot, posted 12-13-2010 11:26 PM Dawn Bertot has not replied

  
dwise1
Member
Posts: 5974
Joined: 05-02-2006
Member Rating: 3.6


Message 120 of 566 (596313)
12-14-2010 10:20 AM
Reply to: Message 116 by Dawn Bertot
12-14-2010 10:07 AM


Did they teach you how to write out a SIMPLE, argument or proposition, the likes of which is, 30 to 40 words or less, as to why I should decovert?
Dawn, please stop acting like an idiot. The topic has never been about you personally deconverting, rather whether those who have deconverted had good reason to. Stop making up nonsense!
Yes, my logic teacher did indeed teach us that the beginning of a debate must include establishing the definitions of the terms that we would be using. Something that so far you have been dead-set against -- so much for your claim of extensive debate experience.
Please stop trying to bullshit us yet again.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 116 by Dawn Bertot, posted 12-14-2010 10:07 AM Dawn Bertot has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024