Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 51 (9179 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: Jorge Parker
Post Volume: Total: 918,178 Year: 5,435/9,624 Month: 460/323 Week: 100/204 Day: 0/16 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Can a valid, supportable reason be offered for deconversion
subbie
Member (Idle past 1366 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 16 of 566 (595445)
12-08-2010 4:15 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Dawn Bertot
12-08-2010 3:15 AM


Sorry, I'm much more interested in an examination of your misuse of the English language, and the many egregious errors you make in every post.
How about a discussion examining (some of) the alledged reasons for deconversion
Alleged, not "alledged."
Put a period at the end of sentences, or, if the sentence happens to be a question, a question mark.
An exploration into the individual justifications concerning these reasons.
Not a sentence, or as my English teachers used to put on my papers to save time, "NAS."
Against a Biblical perspective
NAS
This may not fly with Percy, I know not
Punctuation.
Well, let's review. In four sentences you made five errors. Not a very good average, eh Abbot?
Oh, and just to stay on topic, I do not believe in any deities because there's no evidence of any, just as there's no evidence that you can write coherently.
I can't wait for your next post in this thread.

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Dawn Bertot, posted 12-08-2010 3:15 AM Dawn Bertot has not replied

  
subbie
Member (Idle past 1366 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 203 of 566 (596559)
12-15-2010 3:57 PM
Reply to: Message 202 by Panda
12-15-2010 3:43 PM


Re: scriptural unity
Clearly I am more intelligent than God AND Mr. Hawking.
Put together!

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist

This message is a reply to:
 Message 202 by Panda, posted 12-15-2010 3:43 PM Panda has seen this message but not replied

  
subbie
Member (Idle past 1366 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 211 of 566 (596597)
12-15-2010 7:20 PM
Reply to: Message 209 by dwise1
12-15-2010 7:13 PM


Re: scriptural unity
Uff da!?! Where in the world did you learn that?

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist

This message is a reply to:
 Message 209 by dwise1, posted 12-15-2010 7:13 PM dwise1 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 214 by dwise1, posted 12-15-2010 7:28 PM subbie has replied

  
subbie
Member (Idle past 1366 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 217 of 566 (596611)
12-15-2010 8:49 PM
Reply to: Message 214 by dwise1
12-15-2010 7:28 PM


Re: scriptural unity
Ah yes, Howard Mohr's classic; funny as hell and every word of it gospel truth. I discovered that one summer while I was living in St. Louis; made me terribly homesick.

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist

This message is a reply to:
 Message 214 by dwise1, posted 12-15-2010 7:28 PM dwise1 has not replied

  
subbie
Member (Idle past 1366 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 354 of 566 (597498)
12-22-2010 1:38 AM
Reply to: Message 329 by Dawn Bertot
12-21-2010 6:29 PM


"This is palpably, the most ignorant statement I have ever seen or read" [sic]
We're all well aware you don't proof read your stuff, but thanks for the confirmation.

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist

This message is a reply to:
 Message 329 by Dawn Bertot, posted 12-21-2010 6:29 PM Dawn Bertot has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024