Can a valid, supportable reason be offered for deconversion

This gibberish seems unrelated to my point. Perhaps this is because you find my point unanswerable, or perhaps this is merely another manifestation of your long, hopeless, pointless struggle with the English language.Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

Nonsense.We can test the claim that Jesus fulfilled their prophecies without having to form any prior belief on whether they were inspired, uninspired, lucky guessers, unlucky guessers, possessed by devils, lizard-men from the future, prophets ex post facto or what.Just as you can test my prophecy about the gruuflepuff without first having to know whether God was speaking through me Did you see one? No? Then I was wrong.If it turned out that Jesus did fulfill their prophecies then we might ask if they were inspired.Just as if you had seen a grufflepuff you might then have started wondering what my source of information was.Trying to decide whether they were inspired before deciding whether they were accurate is putting the cart before the horse.Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

No-one is relying on such a source, as you would understand if understanding things was amongst your talents. He has not decided that they are accurate, as you would know if knowing things was your forte. You do not say of what you intended the following drivel to be an example. If it was meant to be an example of a non sequitur, then you have achieved your aim and should rest on your laurels. Otherwise, not so much.

Quite so: just as you might try to demonstrate that the chair you saw on Saturday was not the grufflepuff that I was speaking about.This is easy to do. You would observe that it did not have purple wings nor play the trombone. Then you'd know that my prophecy did not apply to your chair.At no point would you have to assume that I was in any way correct or accurate. No, of course he isn't. Don't be silly. Of course he can; just as you can say that I am not accurate and still know that nothing you saw on Saturday was the fulfillment of my prophecy about the grufflepuff.Indeed, the two go hand in hand. You cannot point out that my prophecy was not fulfilled without also believing that I was inaccurate in making the prophecy.Or at least a rational person couldn't. I do not wish to set arbitrary limits on your capacity for doublethink.Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

Micah 5: ---The rest of your post appears to be your usual nonsensical ravings.

You're welcome. Now, it clearly doesn't describe Jesus, does it?

And yet you have produced a great deal of wind and not noticeably changed anyone's beliefs.Maybe you should give up on the wind and try some arguments with substance.

I'll give you a hint. Of how many of those people have I ever claimed that "the slightest wind would uproot" their belief systems?The answer to my question and yours is the same; this is not a coincidence.