Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 61 (9027 total)
55 online now:
PaulK, Tangle (2 members, 53 visitors)
Newest Member: JustTheFacts
Post Volume: Total: 883,427 Year: 1,073/14,102 Month: 65/411 Week: 86/168 Day: 3/12 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Bible has no contradictions
Newborn
Inactive Member


Message 121 of 221 (46167)
07-15-2003 9:18 PM
Reply to: Message 120 by wally
04-21-2003 7:30 PM


numbers?
Concerning the animal problem:
The number didn´t interest at all(God has more important things to think of).It didn´t care if it is 1 or 2.
For example God could say to you "You will find a horse outdoors" and you can find a bunch of them.Sometimes God don´t accounts for the plural.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 120 by wally, posted 04-21-2003 7:30 PM wally has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 122 by Peter, posted 07-18-2003 6:02 AM Newborn has not yet responded
 Message 124 by crashfrog, posted 07-23-2003 11:10 AM Newborn has responded

Peter
Member (Idle past 269 days)
Posts: 2161
From: Cambridgeshire, UK.
Joined: 02-05-2002


Message 122 of 221 (46407)
07-18-2003 6:02 AM
Reply to: Message 121 by Newborn
07-15-2003 9:18 PM


Re: numbers?
...all of which means you cannot take the Bible literally
and that is all people are saying here.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 121 by Newborn, posted 07-15-2003 9:18 PM Newborn has not yet responded

Dave901
Inactive Member


Message 123 of 221 (47041)
07-23-2003 10:32 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Conspirator
03-06-2003 10:04 AM


Here is a blatant contradiction in the New Testament about the lineage of Jesus.
http://www.evcforum.net/cgi-bin/dm.cgi?action=page&f=1&t=90&p=7
How do you explain it?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Conspirator, posted 03-06-2003 10:04 AM Conspirator has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 126 by Jake22, posted 07-28-2003 9:49 PM Dave901 has not yet responded

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 257 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 124 of 221 (47051)
07-23-2003 11:10 AM
Reply to: Message 121 by Newborn
07-15-2003 9:18 PM


Re: numbers?
God has more important things to think of

How does that even make sense? An all-powerful God that can watch over us all at the same time can think about an infinite number of things at once.

Sometimes God don´t accounts for the plural.

Eh? Why wouldn't an all-knowing, all-powerful God "account for the plural" every time?

It seems you have pretty low expectations for a perfect being.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 121 by Newborn, posted 07-15-2003 9:18 PM Newborn has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 125 by Newborn, posted 07-28-2003 9:16 PM crashfrog has not yet responded

Newborn
Inactive Member


Message 125 of 221 (47790)
07-28-2003 9:16 PM
Reply to: Message 124 by crashfrog
07-23-2003 11:10 AM


Re: numbers?
CrashFrog,I only said that God have his priorities.
For the second quote i should say that when for example in Daniel God talks about animals he is talking about an entire nation or empire for each animal.Gotcha?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 124 by crashfrog, posted 07-23-2003 11:10 AM crashfrog has not yet responded

Jake22
Inactive Member


Message 126 of 221 (47796)
07-28-2003 9:49 PM
Reply to: Message 123 by Dave901
07-23-2003 10:32 AM


In response to Dave 901...
Because this is the second time this has been posted, I just thought I'd say that there are several online sites that readily offer explanations for your geneaology question. I got the following from www.aboutbibleprophesy.com:
"From Abraham to David, the genealogies of Matthew and Luke are almost the same, but from David on they are different. Some scholars suggest that this is because Matthew traces the legal descent of the house of David using only heirs to the throne, while Luke traces the complete line from Joseph to David."
As I believe you mentioned in your post, Matthew is written with an emphasis on Jesus' kingship, probably because the author's christology led him to identify Jesus with the king messiah. Thus it would make sense that he gives a line of kings for Jesus' geneaology to associate Jesus with the next "king."
There are other possible explanations as well, including that the passages are made up, just like the rest of the Bible . It may interest you to do a quick online seach for biblical genealogies to read up on their nature, importance, why they aren't always every generation, and other pretty interesting stuff.

Jake

[This message has been edited by Jake22, 07-28-2003]


This message is a reply to:
 Message 123 by Dave901, posted 07-23-2003 10:32 AM Dave901 has not yet responded

Soloone 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3664 days)
Posts: 3
Joined: 11-24-2010


(1)
Message 127 of 221 (593070)
11-24-2010 1:36 AM


Of course this (Aion Gold) is not an exact science because some production server arrays grow and shrink on a daily basis and some (Aion Gold) test servers are left running all the time. But nevertheless there is a clear trend that shows a continued move of business critical computing to the (WOW Gold) cloud. The upshot of all this is that in dollar terms the spending we've(Buy WOW Gold)seen on cloud computing servers has more than ten-folded between June 2009 and June 2010. We are living in interesting times where the way computing is consumed is changing dramatically, whether at the personal WOW Power Leveling with smart phones and iPads or at the server level in the cloud!

Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Spamming the spam.


hERICtic
Member (Idle past 3307 days)
Posts: 371
Joined: 08-18-2009


Message 128 of 221 (597084)
12-19-2010 1:25 PM
Reply to: Message 78 by Conspirator
03-15-2003 11:41 AM


Yes, I know this is an old thread. But recently, I have been reading as many threads as possible, out of pure interest and hopefully to learn a few things.

Conspirator, an inactive member wrote this:

"According to Roman time, the day ran from midnight to midnight. The Jewish 24 hour period in the evening at 6 p.m. and the morning of that day began at 6 a.m. Therefore, when Mark asserts that at the third hour Christ was crucified, this was about 9 a.m. John stated that Christ's trial was about the sixth hour. This would place the trial before the crucifixion and this would not negate any testimony of the Gospel writers."

Now, every apologist website I have frequented claims the same, regarding Roman time. Midnight, the starting point. Yet outside of these sites, I have yet to find a single reference that Romans followed time in this manner. I have read in a few places that the Romans followed time similiar to the Jews, daylight the starting point. Also, when did the recording of the hours start at midnight?

Thanks.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 78 by Conspirator, posted 03-15-2003 11:41 AM Conspirator has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 129 by Jon, posted 12-19-2010 4:13 PM hERICtic has responded

Jon
Inactive Member


Message 129 of 221 (597092)
12-19-2010 4:13 PM
Reply to: Message 128 by hERICtic
12-19-2010 1:25 PM


Reconciling Crucifixion Accounts
Conspirator writes:

According to Roman time, the day ran from midnight to midnight. The Jewish 24 hour period in the evening at 6 p.m. and the morning of that day began at 6 a.m. Therefore, when Mark asserts that at the third hour Christ was crucified, this was about 9 a.m. John stated that Christ's trial was about the sixth hour. This would place the trial before the crucifixion and this would not negate any testimony of the Gospel writers.

This seems suspect. I also cannot find a specific reference to such information regarding Roman time keeping; Wikipedia, however, does have this to say:

quote:
Wikipedia on Boundaries of the Day:

The Jewish day begins at either sunset or at nightfall (when three second-magnitude stars appear). Medieval Europe followed this tradition, known as Florentine reckoning: in this system, a reference like "two hours into the day" meant two hours after sunset and thus times during the evening need to be shifted back one calendar day in modern reckoning. Days such as Christmas Eve, Halloween, and the Eve of Saint Agnes are the remnants of the older pattern when holidays began the evening before. Present common convention is for the civil day to begin at midnight, that is 00:00 (inclusive), and last a full twenty-four hours until 24:00 (exclusive).

In ancient Egypt, the day was reckoned from sunrise to sunrise. Muslims fast from daybreak to sunset each day of the month of Ramadan. The "Damascus Document", copies of which were also found among the Dead Sea scrolls, states regarding Sabbath observance that "No one is to do any work on Friday from the moment that the sun's disk stands distant from the horizon by the length of its own diameter," presumably indicating that the monastic community responsible for producing this work counted the day as ending shortly before the sun had begun to set.


This doesn't address how the Romans particularly measured time, but it mentions a few traditions from the ancient world. Also, it mentions the Jewish measure of time. As the article says, Jewish days begin at Sunset and end at the following Sunset about 24 hours later. Now, Conspirator's statement regarding the Jewish reckoning of the day is horribly agrammatical, and I cannot really figure out what it is he is trying to say. It appears, though, that his information regarding the Jewish measure of the day is a little off. For starters, he mentions a 24 hour period, but then gives us a period from 6 p.m. to 6 a.m., which is only twelve hours. Also, any information about the reckoning of the day doesn't really help us figure out to what the terms 'third hour' and 'sixth hour' refer, since the measuring of hours could have begun with the morning (when the Sun rises), not necessarily the beginning of the day (when the Sun sets). The NRSV translates the phrases 'third hour' and 'sixth hour' in Mark and John, respectively, as 'nine o'clock in the morning' and 'about noon'.

Many problems arise trying to reconcile the different times of the trial and crucifixion as told in the different gospels. If, as John claims, Jesus was tried on the day before Passover, then, if Conspirator's reconciliation that both Mark's and John's times are accurate is true; it would mean a crucifixion on the morning of the Passover (using John's account of when the trial began, and Mark's timing for the crucifixion, which had to, obviously, take place after the trial). However, according to both Mark and John, Jesus was buried on the day of Preparation (Mk. 15:42; Jn. 19:31). If 'third hour' in Mark really refers to 9 a.m., as Conspirator claims, there is no way to reconcile the two accounts.

Jon


Check out Apollo's Temple!
Ignorance is temporary; you should be able to overcome it. - nwr

This message is a reply to:
 Message 128 by hERICtic, posted 12-19-2010 1:25 PM hERICtic has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 130 by hERICtic, posted 12-19-2010 5:24 PM Jon has not yet responded

hERICtic
Member (Idle past 3307 days)
Posts: 371
Joined: 08-18-2009


Message 130 of 221 (597100)
12-19-2010 5:24 PM
Reply to: Message 129 by Jon
12-19-2010 4:13 PM


Re: Reconciling Crucifixion Accounts
Thanks for the reply.

I agree there are huge problems with the accounts. The Jews did not divide a day into 24 hours.

Its obvious John when refering to the sixth hour was refering to noon.

How do we know. From the events described.

Using apologetics, the sixth hour would be 6 am.

Daybreak, ie morning (sunlight), would be around 530 the earliest. According to John:

28 Then the Jewish leaders took Jesus from Caiaphas to the palace of the Roman governor. By now it was early morning, and to avoid ceremonial uncleanness they did not enter the palace, because they wanted to be able to eat the Passover. 29 So Pilate came out to them and asked, “What charges are you bringing against this man?”

At this point ,earliest its 5:30. Jesus is then:

Dragged before Pilate.
Pharisees have a discussion with Pilate.
Pilate talks to Jesus.
Decides to have Jesus tortured.
Jesus is taken away and tortured.
Jesus is led out to the priests and officers.
The crowd demands Jesus be crucified.
Pilate questions Jesus again.
Priests and officers demand again be crucified.
Pilate decides to crucify him.
Pilate again talks with the priests.
Jesus is taken away to be crucified.

Now imagine all the walking and talking that is not mentioned.

All this ocurred within 30 minutes????

It makes perfect sense to conclude that the sixth hour was noon.

Even worse for the apologists, I used a site that manages to give various times throughout history. In 33, I could not even find a morning in Israel that corresponded to 5:30. Every time I put in came in later. So John could not be refering to 6am.

John though, uses the sixth hour earlier in his gospel.

3He left Judaea, and departed again into Galilee.

4And he must needs go through Samaria.

5Then cometh he to a city of Samaria, which is called Sychar, near to the parcel of ground that Jacob gave to his son Joseph.

6Now Jacob's well was there. Jesus therefore, being wearied with his journey, sat thus on the well: and it was about the sixth hour.

7There cometh a woman of Samaria to draw water: Jesus saith unto her, Give me to drink.

8(For his disciples were gone away unto the city to buy meat.)

Its seems rather unreasonable that Jesus went from Judea to Samaria in the darkness, coming upon the well at around 6am.

It also seems more likely in my opinion, that his disciples would go into the city to buy meat at noon, rather than 6am.

But again, back to my main point. Can anyone show me that the Romans kept time, starting a day at midnight?

I have found sites that claim their day started at morning, from there, various methods were used to break the hours down, be it a sundial or water clock.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 129 by Jon, posted 12-19-2010 4:13 PM Jon has not yet responded

frako
Member
Posts: 2931
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


Message 131 of 221 (597207)
12-20-2010 11:41 AM


I have a few contradictions

God tempts no one.

James 1:13- Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man:

God does tempt!

Genesis 22:1- And it came to pass after these things, that God did tempt Abraham, and said unto him, Abraham: and he said, Behold, here I am.

And why would Jesus ask this, if God tempts no one?

Matthew 6:13- And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil: For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever. Amen.

Whatever you do, don't make graven images

Exodus 20:4- Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth:

Deuteronomy 4:23- Take heed unto yourselves, lest ye forget the covenant of the LORD your God, which he made with you, and make you a graven image, or the likeness of any thing, which the LORD thy God hath forbidden thee.

But let me tell you the proper way to make some graven images.

Exodus 25:18- And thou shalt make two cherubims of gold, of beaten work shalt thou make them, in the two ends of the mercy seat.

Exodus 25:19- And make one cherub on the one end, and the other cherub on the other end: even of the mercy seat shall ye make the cherubims on the two ends thereof.

Exodus 25:20- And the cherubims shall stretch forth their wings on high, covering the mercy seat with their wings, and their faces shall look one to another; toward the mercy seat shall the faces of the cherubims be.

Psalms 58:10- The righteous shall rejoice when he seeth the vengeance: he shall wash his feet in the blood of the wicked

Proverbs 24:17- Rejoice not when thine enemy falleth, and let not thine heart be glad when he stumbleth:

Ezra 2:6- The children of Pahathmoab, of the children of Jeshua and Joab, two thousand eight hundred and twelve.

Nehemiah 7:11- The Children of Pahathmoab, of the children of Jeshua and Joab two thousand eight hundred and eighteen

2 Samuel 8:4- And David took from him a thousand chariots, and seven hundred horsemen, and twenty thousand footmen: and David houghed all the chariot horses, but reserved of them for an hundred chariots.

1 Chronicles 18:4- And David took from him a thousand chariots, and seven thousand horsemen, and twenty thousand footmen: David also houghed all the chariot horses, but reserved of them an hundred chariots.

And tones more


Replies to this message:
 Message 138 by purpledawn, posted 12-25-2010 4:11 PM frako has responded
 Message 139 by purpledawn, posted 12-26-2010 4:11 AM frako has not yet responded
 Message 140 by purpledawn, posted 12-26-2010 5:38 AM frako has responded

fletch
Junior Member (Idle past 3634 days)
Posts: 2
Joined: 12-23-2010


Message 132 of 221 (597723)
12-23-2010 4:48 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by ME2
03-06-2003 4:26 PM


"OUR" image
Prior to God creating life on earth he had already created Jesus and the angles. Jesus is described as the master worker, working with God creating Adam and Eve

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by ME2, posted 03-06-2003 4:26 PM ME2 has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 133 by jar, posted 12-23-2010 5:46 PM fletch has not yet responded
 Message 134 by arachnophilia, posted 12-23-2010 9:22 PM fletch has not yet responded

jar
Member
Posts: 33184
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004
Member Rating: 4.2


Message 133 of 221 (597733)
12-23-2010 5:46 PM
Reply to: Message 132 by fletch
12-23-2010 4:48 PM


Re: "OUR" image
fletch writes:

Jesus is described as the master worker, working with God creating Adam and Eve

Chapter and verse please.


Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 132 by fletch, posted 12-23-2010 4:48 PM fletch has not yet responded

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 134 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 134 of 221 (597757)
12-23-2010 9:22 PM
Reply to: Message 132 by fletch
12-23-2010 4:48 PM


"OUR" image -- a grammatical contradiction
the problem with "our" image isn't where it says "our" image in plural, but where it doesn't. god says,
quote:
נַעֲשֶׂה אָדָם בְּצַלְמֵנוּ כִּדְמוּתֵנוּ
plural. "let us make man in our image, as our likeness." but then, the bible says in the very next verse
quote:
וַיִּבְרָא אֱלֹהִים אֶת-הָאָדָם בְּצַלְמוֹ
singular. "and god made the man in his own image." strange, right? and it's not that they just fudged the vowels, you'd have changed that nun and the beginning of asah (make) into an alef.

he does it again, in genesis 11, too, also quickly followed by a singular action. this just seems to be god's way that he talks to himself. there's no "jesus" or anyone else there, because the actions that actually take place are all grammatically singular.

Edited by arachnophilia, : No reason given.


אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 132 by fletch, posted 12-23-2010 4:48 PM fletch has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 135 by jar, posted 12-23-2010 9:27 PM arachnophilia has responded

jar
Member
Posts: 33184
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004
Member Rating: 4.2


Message 135 of 221 (597760)
12-23-2010 9:27 PM
Reply to: Message 134 by arachnophilia
12-23-2010 9:22 PM


Re: "OUR" image -- a grammatical contradiction
Imperial We; the Majestic plural.


Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 134 by arachnophilia, posted 12-23-2010 9:22 PM arachnophilia has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 136 by arachnophilia, posted 12-23-2010 9:44 PM jar has responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021