Counter-Intuitive Science

Why couldn't these imagined pullers be moving at subluminal speeds?Also, as has been discussed already, the universe's expansion does not involve mass and energy moving at superluminal speeds. That shouldn't be counter intuitive to most people that have "intuited" on the subject to some depth.

Nope The force is directly proportional to the inertial mass which results in the accelerations of dissimilarly masses objects due to gravity being the same.

Perhaps the students were simply contemplating the wrong bad law suit to file. Maybe subject A is mathematics while subject B is nursing.

This reasoning cannot be correct.The question asks what one should do when Monty shows a goat. In other words, Monty's possibility of showing the car should be removed from the considered outcomes, and probabilities would be calculated based on the remaining possible outcomes. It doesn't matter whether Monty picked the goat randomly, by ESP, or by being told which doors hide goats.Slevesque's overlooks that when you initially pick a car, there are two ways for Monty to randomly pick the goat. If you switch your pick in either of those two situations, you lose.Edited by NoNukes, : Address slevesque's post

I believe you are correct. The difference is explained in excruciating detail on the Wiki page.