Summations Only

if the ancient people, in Europe, were all by themselves as the natural selection theory has proposed

What makes you think the theory of natural selection proposes any such thing?

It's understandable and it's clear now, the only possibility that the 55 ethnic groups in Europe came into existence, as linguistic ethnic groups, is that they were previously selected and settled in their respective land, (in their respective area in Europe)

What is a 'linguistic ethnic group'?

Now it's clear that if the 55 distinct ethnic groups had not been previously selected and settled in the land and if their selection would have taken place all by themselves, there wouldn't be ethnic groups in Europe; they would be one miscegenated people.

In fact, you still haven't made this clear—at all.

What makes you think there are only 55 ethnic groups in Europe? What makes you think these groups represent some pristine set of groups that has neither mixed nor changed since the dawn of time?

Jon

---

Check out Apollo's Temple!
Ignorance is temporary; you should be able to overcome it. - nwr

I do not know where you got your list from, but any exclusion of the Basques, clearly shows the list is crap.

---

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

I don't know where you got your list, but it is pure crap. Why should diaspora change ethnicity? Your list doesn't follow any thread of what an ethnic group entails. How are Serbs, Croats & Slovenes different? How are Irish & Scotch different? Where are the Basques & Hungarians? How about Latvians & Lithuaneans?

---

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002

Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969

Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

bluescat48 writes: I don't know where you got your list, but it is pure crap.

Have you noticed that the names are listed alphabetically, except:

CD7 writes: Lists of British people Lists of Italians Lists of Swedes

I think these were sub-headings which are now included as part of the 55.

This has the "List of"s in there

http://en.wikipedia.org/...ory:Europe_ethnic_group_templates

I don't know what points to these templates without the "Template" part in there but the list seems to be the same.

CS writes: This has the "List of"s in there

Aaah. That's where it is from.
(I couldn't find it, but I was sure it was copied from somewhere.)

CS writes: I don't know what points to these templates without the "Template" part in there but the list seems to be the same.

I can't find what uses that template either.
But if you look at the template, "List of ..." is clearly not meant to be an ethnic group.

Well, maybe CD7 will understand his mistake. *shrug*

From looking at the website it looks to me to be a source of ammunition for bigots.

---

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002

Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969

Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

bluescat48 writes: From looking at the website it looks to me to be a source of ammunition for bigots.

What, Wikipedia?
If the information is incomplete, then you are allowed to add to it.

But the incompleteness of the information is not a good enough excuse for flawed arguments based on ignorance.
If bigots want to use it to bolster their arguments, then they should expect to be wrong.

When are bigots ever right?

---

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002

Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969

Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

edited

Edited by Taz, : No reason given.

I havent seen you in like forever

{Sheesh - The "OFF TOPIC - DO NOT RESPOND" banner not big enough for you to see? - Adminnemooseus}

Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Hide, note, big version of "off-topic" banner.

This part of the discussion was deemed off-topic because CD7 had made no actual reference to Morris' model nor to any specifically YEC claims. So Buz opened another topic, Is Global Population Evidence For Noahic Flood?. But it turns out that Buz' OP does not reflect what the topic was supposed to be about (or so he says after the fact), so it's now being threatened with being closed until he can get it straight.

Edited by dwise1, : corrected minor typo

Taq writes: This development starts quite slow, and is dependent on random inventions along the way to keep things moving. ..you need a stable society that requires thousands of years of developing cultivars

-

Wasps always had a perfect nervous system and a brain ready to do only what's best;
and it does not require a stable society; a single wasp builds a house with plenty food for the new one(s) to come,
and when the new wasp is ready it does not ask 'who has built this house; who prepared this meal for me?'

Even so, when Earth's population was 10,000 a single family did not require a stable society

In those days, from all ethnic groups in Europe, there was always (at least) 1,000 inhabitants or more who were stable enough to only do what is best for their children.

Many times people have gazed and lied, instead of wonder how much there is to know; there are other things to see along the open road; it isn't just evolution and/or creation.

quote:

---

Creationism and their scribes state that the Earth would have been made by a deity, a god or elohiym.

However,
In the re-editions that were made for the Hebrew bible and precisely in the first five books, evidences are found that whenever the generic term for deities, elohiym, appears in reference to the living Word, it appears in places where the texts were re-edited not by Mosheh but by the pen of the scribes.

Because Mosheh, when writing about his deeds, does not do it using the third person of the singular saying ‘he did’. The clues indicate that in the original manuscripts, written by the pen of Mosheh, he speaks about his deeds using the first person of the singular, ‘I did’.

---

Even so, when Earth's population was 10,000 a single family did not require a stable society In those days, from all ethnic groups in Europe, there was always (at least) 1,000 inhabitants or more who were stable enough to only do what is best for their children.

So how did they innoculate their children against diptheria?