The greatest evidence of this, is all of the cave drawings. Remember that these paintings were done long before the "science" of Archeology. The cavemen didn't have computer modelling to put the bones back together and put flesh on the bones.
I've seen 'em. You don't need computer modeling or "archaeology" (or
paleontology, which is the study of fossils) to produce vague squiggles and smudges which creationists pretend look like dinosaurs.
Nor, indeed, would you need "computer modeling" to produce a picture of something which actually
did look like a dinosaur, you'd just need some bones. Our nineteenth-century ancestors produced pictures that were actually pictures of dinosaurs and not smudges and squiggles, and they did it all without the assistance of computers.
This picture, for example, is far more accurate than the blurred sudges of "cave art":
It was produced by someone who had never seen a dinosaur
or a computer.
The forum rules prohibit debating by link. If there's any of that stuff you believe is true, try to present it in your own words, and if possible with supporting evidence.
Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.