Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 66 (9078 total)
113 online now:
dwise1, PaulK (2 members, 111 visitors)
Newest Member: harveyspecter
Post Volume: Total: 895,136 Year: 6,248/6,534 Month: 441/650 Week: 211/278 Day: 7/44 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   When Earth’s population was 10,000 persons
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 469 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 74 of 194 (603773)
02-07-2011 3:17 PM
Reply to: Message 71 by bluescat48
02-06-2011 11:58 AM


Re: What differentiates human prototypes from alleged ancestry
bluescat48 writes:

Let's get rid of the BELIEVING!

That is what I do.I separate everything into 3 categories. Acceptance, Rejection or skepticism.

Acceptance = strong evidence
Rejection = lack of evidence
Skepticism = weak evidence

-

It takes more than a possibility left to actually verify what really took place 30,000 years ago,

Acceptance – strong evidence - when you have the proof that 30,000 years ago there was Human life IN REPRODUCTION naturally and spontaneously [for example, the skeletons of two real relatives; father and son or a mother and her child] then that is the evidence of evolution.

-

Rejection – lack of evidence - when the above proof is not found then the alleged 'genealogical continuity', in regards to a skeleton dated at 30,000, is still a presumed POSSIBILITY of descendents or ancestry.

-

Weak evidence – therefore the so called evidence is weak in regards to proof of descendants and only proves that there was human prototype(s); an older version of a perfect human product on the Earth.

-

Conclusion: The above proof is necessary so that the possibility can be called total SURENESS.

If one states that a possibility is assurance then he's believing;
That is the clear purpose of every camouflage - to make believe
Without believing or making believe there's no possibility at all of a robber [or one that deceives] to do his job;
his carrier would be in permanent vacation.

-

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : updated

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update


This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by bluescat48, posted 02-06-2011 11:58 AM bluescat48 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 75 by Taq, posted 02-07-2011 3:48 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied
 Message 76 by bluescat48, posted 02-07-2011 5:36 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 469 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 77 of 194 (603885)
02-08-2011 4:25 PM
Reply to: Message 76 by bluescat48
02-07-2011 5:36 PM


All that has a beginning –originated by the Earth– has an end
bluescat48 writes:


If Humans were not reproducing 30000 years ago how is that we, humans are here today?

-

The above question implies the belief that the origin or beginning of Human life would be solely somewhere in the past.
All that has a beginning, produced by the Earth, has an end;

If the beginning of Human life was solely somewhere in the past, or if the beginning would have taken place ocasionally,

then a point of origin would be just a place with nutrient properties called Earth,
which means that Human beings themselves would be a personified and most evolved extension of what the Earth is;

However, if the point of origin would be just a place called Earth
then the nutrient properties originated and produced by the Earth itself would give you life rather than just keep you alive.

If the Earth gave you life, rather than just keeping alive, then you would live more than 120 years.

-

The fact is that there are nutrient properties that give you life, rather than just keeping you alive, which are not produced by the Earth itself.

These nutrient properties that give you life are produced by the trees that have a firm trunk and branches, like every strong tree.

-

If the origin of the Human body has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that instruction was given for one to eat solely fruits; and only the fruits from compatible trees;

then why do many men of the evolution theory immediately reject the fact that eating solely fruits reduces the intragastric acidity and gives life indefinitely ?

-

quote:
From the dust – The nutrients of regular food come from the dust of the ground. You become what you eat. After 49 years old the aging process accelerates because it is not possible to profit from eating the nutrient properties which the regular food is made of since the Human body was made of the same properties from the dust of the ground.

From the solid tree – Nutrients of the compatible fruits do not come from the dust of the ground. They are filtered essences produced by the solid tree. The extension of her trunk is made up of millions of little bitty tubes that do filter and separate the nutrients out. On this, the fruit of the solid tree is a property given exclusively by the tree.


-


This message is a reply to:
 Message 76 by bluescat48, posted 02-07-2011 5:36 PM bluescat48 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 78 by Taq, posted 02-08-2011 4:32 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied
 Message 79 by bluescat48, posted 02-08-2011 11:50 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 469 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 80 of 194 (604014)
02-09-2011 3:39 PM
Reply to: Message 79 by bluescat48
02-08-2011 11:50 PM


There never was an answer without you seeing
bluescat48 writes:

If Humans were not reproducing 30000 years ago how is that we, humans are here today?

-

It is not the type of answer a person gets from other persons experience
so that no one will need to give credit or work up a belief in a theory.

Significance - There is never an answer without you seeing and experiencing it for yourself

-

There are clues that might help with the answer, a person might ask him-herself about the first instruction of Genesis [as originally written] which is about eating solely fruits and only the compatible ones.

If a person does what the first instruction clears up for one to do, would (s)he still experience the aging process and die the death of old age?

If a person does it and still dies of old age then even the ancient writings of Genesis as originally written are telling you lies.

-

quote:
An electric generator does not produce enough power to keep itself operating, even so the consumption of regular food when you’re older will never be enough to restore the initial amount of calcium, proteins and hormones that are released from the brain in order for the production of the gastric juice necessary to digest regular food or dead flesh.

When one feeds the Human body solely with fruits; and only fruits from the compatible trees, then a lot of hormones, calcium and proteins do not have to be constantly released from the brain in order for the production of gastric juice that is necessary to digest dead flesh or regular food.


-

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update


This message is a reply to:
 Message 79 by bluescat48, posted 02-08-2011 11:50 PM bluescat48 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 81 by bluescat48, posted 02-09-2011 6:49 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied
 Message 82 by Coragyps, posted 02-09-2011 7:01 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied
 Message 87 by frako, posted 02-12-2011 7:32 AM goldenlightArchangel has not replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 469 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 84 of 194 (604374)
02-11-2011 3:26 PM
Reply to: Message 82 by Coragyps
02-09-2011 7:01 PM


There never was an answer without you seeing it
Coragyps writes:

If a person does it and still dies of old age then even the ancient writings of Genesis as originally written are telling you lies.

Which the writings most assuredly are.

Of course the versions of bibles do lie in almost all things,
because of the lying pen of the scribes who have kept the lie: the generic term god or elohiym

Let's not mix that with the ancient writings of Genesis as originally written,

-

This might help with the answer to the question,
'If Humans were not reproducing 30000 years ago how is that humans are here today?'

The following is a sample of what can be verified with science; ascertained truth of the facts,
in regards to the original manuscripts of Genesis,

- Authenticity and validity of the first instruction of Genesis
- Evidences of the existence of the tree of life

Become experienced on a return to immortality by eating solely fruits, and only fruits from the compatible trees

Estimate time for reduction of intragastric acidity to 50% less - 3 and a half weeks
Approximate time to change the stability of the nervous systemn - 49 days

quote:
Is immortality attainable?

Immortality is simply stopping from dying by stopping from eating incompatible food. In regards to death by old age, a person is already immortal and will not die of old age as long as the digestive system will not continue to produce the type of intragastric acidity necessary to consume incompatible foods.


Perfection and Synchrony between Purpose and Design – The fruits from the compatible solid trees were designed and made for this purpose: to give permanence to what was designed and made for them, the Human body.

For if [regular] food was made for the Human body, then the Human body would have been made for food, and it would not be brought to naught.

Modified fragment from versio vulgata, ‘Meats for the belly, and the belly for meats; but both are brought to nothing’

In the New Living Translation, the original words become even more eclipsed and a parenthesis exposes the part that was added,

You say, ‘Food was made for the stomach, and the stomach for food.' (This is true, though someday….)’. – English Standard Version substitutes the parenthesis with a dash.

-

Coragyps writes:

Where do you get protein if you eat only fruit? How do you live past three months of age with no protein?

-

Today scientists explain this fact rather simply – it is common knowledge that Noni (Morinda Citrifolia) is rich in proteins. -- [http://wildeuropetrips.com]

These proteins have various traits and destination: some feed the cell and deliver building material, others – like damnacanthal – have the ability to repair genetic code, yet others transport valuable nutritive elements to the cell. Natural Noni fruit juice supplies our organism with the ideal substances mixture aiding and driving biochemical process.

-

Important elements found in the fruit of the Tree of life (Morinda Citrifolia),
http://www.noni.com.pa/german Verwendung:

Die Frucht ist sehr bekannt in Panama und anderen Ländern.
Analysen haben gezeigt, dass sie sehr reich ist an Grundbestandteilen für die menschliche Ernährung, wie:

Fasern (Fiber)
Proteinen (Proteins)
Eisen (Iron)
Vitamin C
Kalzium (Calcium)
Zink (Zinc)

-

The Tree of life in real time

The fruit from the tree of life, Morinda Citrifolia, is the only tree that has these two virtues:

- Gives her fruit every month; 12 times a year
- Her leaves are for health in extense areas – [health of the nations]

-

Polinesian Noni contains many transport proteins, the so called chelates, which are equipped with a ‘PIN code’ opening the door to all natural living cells, including the ones in our organism. Human being is a part of nature and so easily accepts and absorbs natural elements with transport aminoacids bonds (chelates) that can open even

‘the most opposing and dogged locks in the cells.’

Our organism does not like absorbing pasteurised, dried in heat, or heated products. In the same way, it doesn’t like synthetics – chemical forms of vitamins, minerals, antibiotics or other drugs which are not related to chelate

(the transport protein) – and absorbs them badly. In order to assimilate them in minor amounts, it has to make use of its own reserves of proteins and energy, weakening the immunity at the same time. – the side effects can even lead to the organism’s poisoning.

Owing to the large quantities of vegetal proteins, Noni juice is capable of transporting and implementing many substances into a cell, including the synthetic ones. Between the Noni proteins and other substances, there appears synergism of action – better absorbance of healing substances is achieved which in turn effects in several – times better assimilation. Diabetics can be an example here: the amount of insulin is lowered until its total elimination (depending on the stage of the disease).

Polinesian Noni can be applied together with medications – there are no contraindications. It is clear then that Noni does not contradict the role of modern medicine – just the opposite – it has been proved that in the cases of cancer, the treatment results were much better when the activity of noni was joined with reduced doses of standard chemotherapy. Thanks to Polinesian Noni we can avoid unpleasant side-effects of drugs, lower the doses or even stop the intake. It often happens that after specialist examination, the doctor lowers the dose of adminitered medication even to eliminate it totally. Noni reinforces the effectiveness of the activity of medications, supplements, and herbs.

Let us suppose that for any reason the ‘door-opening mechanism’ in a cell does not work well – the lock is jammed.

Vitamins, trace elements, glucose, and proteins cannot penetrate into the cell’s inside. On the other hand, the waste products cannot leave the cells. What can happen if we keep storing the ragbags, which need to be taken out, in the hall of our house? Can such a situation last for weeks, months or even years? Surely, there won’t be any fresh air to breath with. Just the contrary – there will be more mice, rats, and other worms preying on the waste and propagating in a flash.

What happens in such a case in our organism’s cell?

The cell is weak and starving, metabolism does not work properly, and it is not strong enough to oppose the thousands of animalcules living on it. Its inefficiency automatically influences other cells of the system and the whole process of mutual cells reinforcement is more and more disrupted. The bioenergetic field of the pathogenic animalcules negativelly influences the field of the healthy cells disrupting their proper energy. This is the beginning of the destruction process of cells and tissues until it leads to serious pathogenic changes in the organism.

All nutritive elements will get to our cells owing to chelates and the ‘key’ proteins. They will feed them, provide them with energy from the biologically active and living Noni fruit (which guarantees the lyophilisation process), ‘clean and air’ them. -- [http://wildeuropetrips.com]

-


This message is a reply to:
 Message 82 by Coragyps, posted 02-09-2011 7:01 PM Coragyps has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 85 by Coragyps, posted 02-11-2011 4:02 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied
 Message 86 by bluescat48, posted 02-11-2011 6:02 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 469 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 95 of 194 (605192)
02-17-2011 2:57 PM
Reply to: Message 34 by Panda
01-28-2011 4:20 PM


Re: Distinction between human prototypes and ancestor
Panda writes:

Have you noticed that the names are listed alphabetically, except:

CD7 writes:

Lists of British people
Lists of Italians
Lists of Swedes

I think these were sub-headings which are now included as part of the 55.

-

A word was missing. It was a List of 55 Dispersions of ethnic groups

-


This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by Panda, posted 01-28-2011 4:20 PM Panda has not replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 469 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 96 of 194 (605705)
02-21-2011 4:17 PM
Reply to: Message 85 by Coragyps
02-11-2011 4:02 PM


There never was an answer without you experiencing it
-

Coragyps writes:


Added by edit: Wikipedia says "..has a strong smell and bitter taste.."

-

The above info demonstrates to be a result of double ignorance.

Because just as the new oranges are just momentarily green and temporarily not sweet
even so the fruit from the tree of life, Morinda Citrifolia, becomes white when it is ready to be eaten.
And when it is white then it is not bitter anymore.

-

With regard to the smell, the quoted info demonstrates to be a blind leading the blind,

When the fruit of Morinda Citrifolia is White then it is in the same level of a refined soya oil; it does not have a smell

After the fruit is white,
a person has approximately three days to eat it before the fruit begins to decompose.

-

After the three days then the white fruit of Morinda Citrifolia suddenly begins to decompose;

Therefore the vomit smell is just a consequence of the sudden decomposition.

-

quote:
This might help with the answer to the question,
'If Humans were not reproducing 30000 years ago how is that humans are here today?'

The following is a sample of what can be verified with science; ascertained truth of the facts,
in regards to the original manuscripts of Genesis,

- Authenticity and validity of the first instruction of Genesis
- Evidences of the existence of the tree of life


-

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update


This message is a reply to:
 Message 85 by Coragyps, posted 02-11-2011 4:02 PM Coragyps has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 97 by Theodoric, posted 02-21-2011 4:43 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied
 Message 100 by bluescat48, posted 02-24-2011 1:10 AM goldenlightArchangel has replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 469 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 98 of 194 (606059)
02-23-2011 4:03 PM
Reply to: Message 97 by Theodoric
02-21-2011 4:43 PM


There never was an answer without you experiencing it
Being the only tree that gives her fruits 12 months a year it is evident that when the green fruit becomes white it does not give one much time for it to be eaten;

The complete white fruits from the tree of life in real time, Morinda Citrifolia, do only last as fruits for no longer than three days; In a decomposed state it can't be called an actual fruit anymore.

When those three days are complete then the white fruit does desintegrate in less than 35 minutes;
the white flesh within the thin skin becomes a liquid with a vomit smell.

-

Theodoric writes:


Any references that might back you on this?

-

Real references are given to anyone who will make some calls and speak to people who live in the cultivation areas;
as it is said, there never was an answer without you experiencing it.

One won't have the real references when speaking to those who do commercialize the so called 'juice' of the fruit.
because they believe that the fruits were made to be consummed in their decomposed and liquid form; which equates to the state of a rotten orange; They even try to reduce the vomit smell by mixing it with juice of grapes or other fruit.

-


This message is a reply to:
 Message 97 by Theodoric, posted 02-21-2011 4:43 PM Theodoric has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 99 by Theodoric, posted 02-23-2011 5:13 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 469 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 101 of 194 (606292)
02-24-2011 3:38 PM
Reply to: Message 99 by Theodoric
02-23-2011 5:13 PM


Why many have a need to believe rather than check the info
Theodoric writes:

..People will be more likely to believe you..

-

Anything that follows a corrupted version of writings that tell many lies to the people saying that they were made by a god, elohiym; -- a generic term for deities in the Middle east--.

never made nor does it intend to make any valid point. Even when you ask a believer 'Is the word god/elohiym a Sacred--Set Apart name?' he is not able to say a yes or no answer, because even their translators of bibles were taught to tell lies.

The corrupted bibles won't help anyone to prove anything important unless a person recognizes that there's a distinction to be made between the versions and the first instruction of Genesis as originally written.

The above distinction is important because the previous posts talk about what can be verified with science,

- Authenticity and validity of the first instruction of Genesis
- Evidences of the existence of the tree of life

However, any of these two Items won't help nor be a fine thing in case you are a believer.
Which of you is able truly to say that the above two Items can not be ascertained with science?

And since I say what is true, why you still have a need to believe me rather than check the info by yourselves?

Because I tell you the truth and the truth can not be retained through believing.

-

quote:
Which one of you convicts me of not telling the truth?

And since I am telling you the truth, why do you not believe Me?

because whoever is of the Truth hears the words of truth;

for this reason you do not retain any words of truth,

because you are believers like your *father.

[*Legion; Ravãb; to be many].


Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update


This message is a reply to:
 Message 99 by Theodoric, posted 02-23-2011 5:13 PM Theodoric has not replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 469 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 102 of 194 (606474)
02-25-2011 3:15 PM
Reply to: Message 100 by bluescat48
02-24-2011 1:10 AM


This tree of life is the only exception
-

bluescat48 writes:

Just calling a plant the "Tree of Life" doesn't make it so

-

Of course it doesn't.
It's too easy to dismiss whether or not the tree of life is just a metaphor or really and still exists
Let's verify first the factors why this is not about a common tree

-

Is there any other tree whose root is totally golden and that has the same amount of calcium and proteins?

Is there any actual tree out there giving fruits 12 times a year?

Is there any reason why this tree of life would not be the only exception?

-


This message is a reply to:
 Message 100 by bluescat48, posted 02-24-2011 1:10 AM bluescat48 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 103 by Theodoric, posted 02-25-2011 4:18 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied
 Message 104 by Coyote, posted 02-25-2011 7:44 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied
 Message 105 by bluescat48, posted 02-25-2011 8:36 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 469 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 106 of 194 (606831)
02-28-2011 2:38 PM
Reply to: Message 103 by Theodoric
02-25-2011 4:18 PM


This tree of life is the only exception
-

Theodoric writes:

Amazingly nowhere on the internet is there any support

-

Knowing that new discoveries do not have references, whenever a new discovery is revealed,

there is always the following support,

people are able to comment exactly which statements would be wrong and why.

It's so much easier to do that.

-

quote:
Real references are given to anyone who will make some calls and speak to people who live in the cultivation areas;
as it is said, there never was an answer without you experiencing it.

One won't have the real references when speaking to those who do commercialize the so called 'juice' of the fruit.
because they believe that the fruits were made to be consummed in their decomposed and liquid form; which equates to the state of a rotten orange; They even try to reduce the vomit smell by mixing it with juice of grapes or other fruit.


-


This message is a reply to:
 Message 103 by Theodoric, posted 02-25-2011 4:18 PM Theodoric has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 107 by Theodoric, posted 02-28-2011 8:43 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 469 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 108 of 194 (607045)
03-01-2011 3:07 PM
Reply to: Message 107 by Theodoric
02-28-2011 8:43 PM


Re: This tree of life is the only exception
Theodoric writes:

Why should we believe..

..we should unquestioningly believe? Give me one good reason to believe you.

-

The point was already cleared up to you.
The first instruction of Genesis is not a matter of believing;
it was written to be verified, investigated and experienced.

It was also highlighted that the believing is of the demon called Ravãb [Legion; to be many].

The bible you use was reversed to include the system of the dragon.

In order to let you know that the first instruction of Genesis as originally written was never written to be believed but to be verified and experienced,
a new topic will be proposed.

-


This message is a reply to:
 Message 107 by Theodoric, posted 02-28-2011 8:43 PM Theodoric has not replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 469 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 109 of 194 (627250)
08-01-2011 5:19 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by Coyote
01-25-2011 12:20 AM


Here is some evidence for you
-

It's higly recommended that you go consult a Mathematician, before believing or giving credit,

that 10 thousand persons would take more than 20 thousand years to reach a population of 1 million.

-

70 thousand years ago . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,000 inhabitants

50 thousand years ago . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 million inhabitants

40 thousand years ago . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ?

35 thousand years ago . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ?

-


This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Coyote, posted 01-25-2011 12:20 AM Coyote has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 110 by fearandloathing, posted 08-01-2011 5:41 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 469 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 111 of 194 (627489)
08-02-2011 3:51 PM
Reply to: Message 110 by fearandloathing
08-01-2011 5:41 PM


Re: Here is some evidence for you
-

fearandloathing writes:

Just for clarity could you show us how you came up with your #'s?

It's just what the natural selection theory for the origin of the Human body comes up with, and the info being given does always omit why, 70 thousand years ago, 1,000 persons would never have the conditions to multiplicate and reach a population of 10,000 persons in less than 20 thousand years.

Can't any Mathematician bother doing any Math research.

-

And many have said anything to avoid what a few are only just starting to realize, that the natural selection theory for the origin of the Human body is based on a disconnection between time and place, whenever it places the Humans (as if they were) multiplicating from 70,000 to 50,000 years ago,

then avoids to explain why it would take over 20 thousand years for the human population to grow from 10 thousand to a million.

-


This message is a reply to:
 Message 110 by fearandloathing, posted 08-01-2011 5:41 PM fearandloathing has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 112 by fearandloathing, posted 08-02-2011 4:05 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied
 Message 116 by Taq, posted 08-02-2011 7:54 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 469 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


(1)
Message 113 of 194 (627505)
08-02-2011 4:37 PM
Reply to: Message 112 by fearandloathing
08-02-2011 4:05 PM


Re: Here is some evidence for you
-

Let's even use in the Math operation the 123 years that it took just to add another 1 billion to the human population and you'll soon begin to see the logic of how it's impossible that 70, 000 years of human evolution without any breaks what so ever is totally and logically impossible.

-


This message is a reply to:
 Message 112 by fearandloathing, posted 08-02-2011 4:05 PM fearandloathing has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 114 by fearandloathing, posted 08-02-2011 4:43 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied
 Message 115 by fearandloathing, posted 08-02-2011 4:50 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 469 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 117 of 194 (628456)
08-09-2011 4:52 PM
Reply to: Message 116 by Taq
08-02-2011 7:54 PM


A belief named Natural selection theory for the origin of the Human body
-

Evidence that the Natural selection theory for the origin of the Human body is a belief based intent of explanation and takes a wide stretch of believing:

because it requires one to believe that when Earth's population was at 10,000 inhabitants that it would have taken over 55 thousand years to reach 1 million.

-

Taq, the justification for the formula: This formula is presented as a possibility based on the statement that families of Humans would have been multiplying for over 150 thousand years.

quote:

-
70 thousand years ago . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,000 inhabitants
50 thousand years ago . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 million inhabitants
40 thousand years ago . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ?
35 thousand years ago . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ?
25 thousand years ago . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ?

-

Final Conclusion: That there were no families of Humans multiplying on the Earth 70 thousand years ago is evident, because of the fact that all things the Humans have done to the place called Earth during a single cluster of 7 thousand years, or when Earth’s population was 1 million persons, they would have done the same thing anyway during any of the three sequences of 14 thousand years that immediately precede the recent 7 thousand years.

Disconnection of time and place can be seen from the incompatibility between the consequences of having Humans on the Earth for a time no longer than 14 thousand years and the time proposed for their multiplication by the natural selection theory for the origin of the Human body.


-

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update


This message is a reply to:
 Message 116 by Taq, posted 08-02-2011 7:54 PM Taq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 118 by rueh, posted 08-10-2011 12:03 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied
 Message 119 by Taq, posted 08-10-2011 1:10 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022