Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,258 Year: 3,515/9,624 Month: 386/974 Week: 0/275 Day: 0/18 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The persistent question of evidence ...
AdminModulous
Administrator
Posts: 897
Joined: 03-02-2006


Message 6 of 10 (604288)
02-10-2011 9:47 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by RAZD
02-10-2011 9:24 PM


Hi RAZD,
did you mean to post that in this thread? It doesn't seem to be related to the OP. I'm not sure posting a response to criticism in another thread in a PNT will be viewed as entirely good form, especially a PNT that has stalled and is likely to not be promoted. Is there some good reason to be here? This PNT doesn't appear to be going to be promoted since it was for a GD where the other person declined.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by RAZD, posted 02-10-2011 9:24 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by RAZD, posted 02-10-2011 9:56 PM AdminModulous has replied

AdminModulous
Administrator
Posts: 897
Joined: 03-02-2006


Message 8 of 10 (604293)
02-10-2011 11:27 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by RAZD
02-10-2011 9:56 PM


Re: just more definition of the basic argument.
Could you concisely sum up the basic argument this debate would be about?
Is it about who has the burden of the evidence under what circumstances in general. Is it about the specific question of god? Is it about the quality of the evidence or lack thereof it either way? Your extra definition was longer than your OP it would seem - and rather than being about whether you are required to provide evidence is about you not being persuaded by a certain argument.
Subbie expressed an interest in a debate with you where he would support ' the proposition that gods do not exist.' - so if that's the kind of thing you want to do here, and Subbie is still interested, you can have at it. Subbie, let us know.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by RAZD, posted 02-10-2011 9:56 PM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

AdminModulous
Administrator
Posts: 897
Joined: 03-02-2006


Message 9 of 10 (604394)
02-11-2011 6:21 PM


subbie and RAZD only
subbie has confirmed his interest so I'm promoting this.

AdminModulous
Administrator
Posts: 897
Joined: 03-02-2006


Message 10 of 10 (604404)
02-11-2011 6:25 PM


Thread Copied to The Great Debate Forum
Thread copied to the The persistent question of evidence (RAZD and subbie only) thread in the The Great Debate forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024