Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 73 (8962 total)
213 online now:
caffeine, jar, PaulK, Theodoric (4 members, 209 visitors)
Newest Member: Samuel567
Post Volume: Total: 871,142 Year: 2,890/23,288 Month: 1,081/1,809 Week: 200/313 Day: 12/69 Hour: 4/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The persistent question of evidence (RAZD and subbie only)
Adminnemooseus
Director
Posts: 3913
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 3 of 42 (604397)
02-03-2011 6:14 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by RAZD
02-03-2011 2:57 AM


Coyote says no
Coyote writes:

No, not interested.

That proposed post is nothing more than has been posted many times before, a meaningless word salad that demonstrates once again that philosophy is nothing more than naval gazing.

I have better things to do than to go around in philosophical circles.

Source

Adminnemooseus

Added by edit (from my "Peanut Gallery" message, prior to the above cited:

Adminnemooseus writes:

Admittedly, I haven't followed it closely, but I wasn't impressed with your performance in the current "Great Debate". Bluejeans seemed to be trying to do a dialog and you seemed to be doing some sort of stonewall, refusing to respond to his content. But it seemed to be some sort of prove/disprove God sort of a thing, doomed to wallow in some sort of abstract fuzziness - A wallow you seem to like. Bottom line - It was outside of my comprehension and I really didn't care.

That said, for better or worse, I don't foresee you offering up anything more than what you already said in the PNT message 1. I don't see any point in again going through the same routine as the current "Great Debate".

So, I'm leaning "No". If Coyote really wants to make a go of it, I'll leave it up to another admin to deal with the promotion.

Or something like that (aka - You have me boggled and apathetic).

Adminnemooseus

Edited by Adminnemooseus, : See above.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by RAZD, posted 02-03-2011 2:57 AM RAZD has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by RAZD, posted 02-05-2011 8:30 PM Adminnemooseus has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020